Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. J

      Antonyuk and Gun Owners of America vs Bruen

      There are at least some rules around this. It's been years and I don't remember the cases to look them up, but there were two cases in MA District that were related and the second one went to the same judge as the first one. I can't remember the exact posture or whether it was a local rule...
    2. J

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      About the same as the odds of Maryland providing a free AR-15 to every resident.
    3. J

      Duncan v Berrcerra

      When does 9CA announce the en banc panel?
    4. J

      Drummond v. Township of Robinson

      Doesn't PA have state preemption of local firearms laws?
    5. J

      Ruling upholds Massachusetts’ ban on AR-15s

      You realize the opinion you're quoting came out just over two years ago and is being considered for review by SCOTUS today, right?
    6. J

      Rhode Island Taser Case Filed

      What's the difference between a motion for judgement on the pleadings and a motion for summary judgement?
    7. J

      Rhode Island Taser Case Filed

      Isn't the surreply order relatively unusual? What did they ask for?
    8. J

      Lawsuit filed challenging Hawaii's citizenship requirement for carry permits

      Massachusetts too.
    9. J

      En banc Decision in Peruta -- a loss

      Also, it's extremely unlikely that SCOTUS would make such a blockbuster ruling without hearing the case themselves. GVRs are for cases where the ruling below is clearly wrong in light of new SCOTUS precedent and things like that.
    10. J

      SAF-7CA panel knocks down Chicago anti gun zoning rule

      I wonder how many more years they'll spend litigating the fees. I forget which case it was (I think Moore) where Chicago complained that Alan Gura tipped too much.
    11. J

      NYSR&P v. NYC oral argument

      What about all of the people with Illinois carry permits? Or the green card holders in Massachusetts who can own guns now. Or the people with minor marijuana convictions who can own guns in MA.
    12. J

      RI district judge upholds may-issue

      Except Hightower is CA1 precedent, so it's binding, unlike a CA7 decision. I obviously think Hightower is wrong, and you could maybe make an argument that it's superseded by Caetano, but I don't see an anti-gun court buying it. That will take SCOTUS saying so explicitly instead of implicitly.
    13. J

      SAF Sues Illinois over LTC Residency Requirements

      Appellee's brief due on or before 05/27/2016 for Lisa Madigan, Leo P. Schmitz and Jessica Trame. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/10/2016
    14. J

      SAF sues Montana

      If you pony up the full cost, I'm sure SAF would be happy to organize the suits you want. KD's point is this case will literally be free, because Montana will pay the costs. Should they just not do it even though it's free?
    15. J

      Commonwealth v. Caetano

      From scotusblog's relist watch: (http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/03/relist-watch-79/#more-239825) I think they're most likely right.
    16. J

      Commonwealth v. Caetano

      And again. I'm guessing Scalia was writing a dissent from denial and now Thomas has taken it over. I don't dare hope for any better outcome.
    17. J

      SAF files Suit in Illinois over Right to Carry

      I forgot about this for a while, but something just jogged my memory to look it up. The results are: Amount Gura and Co initially requested: $219,807 Amount the court ordered Illinois to pay: $153,871 Amount the parties agreed to settle fees for arguing about it: $68,120. Meaning...
    18. J

      Commonwealth v. Caetano

      Discussion at ScotusBlog said no one can remember the court closing for weather, and at least some justices think they can't. Today was just orders and opinions, so no one (lawyers or litigants) had to fly in.
    19. J

      Commonwealth v. Caetano

      Yes, they released an order list at 930AM today. Nothing about Caetano, so now we wait until Feb 22 to hear anything (next conference is the 19th).
    20. J

      Freidman v. Highland Park (AWB)

      I don't think Hillary's justices will help our side. There was 58 years between Plessy and Brown. Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk
    Top Bottom