Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. S

      SB1 - Injunctive relief is provided for private property, locations that sell alcohol, and public demonstrations.

      Thanks, Deep Lurker. This article was enlightening. It looks like this year we'll be faced with legislative proposals like: 1. ...earlier youth intervention (maybe forcing anti-2A and Bill of Rights training into MD schools, or similar indoctrination?) 2. ...cracking down on illegal weapons...
    2. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Socialist and partisan hack.
    3. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      It's irredeemably deplorable behavior.
    4. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=theodore+chuang
    5. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      At this point the County's leaders are exposing themselves to claims under 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law. It is obvious from MSI's multiple filings, including and again on pages 16 and 17 of the latest MSI filing, that the County is willfully and continuously...
    6. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      MoCo's new flag?
    7. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Correct
    8. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Delayed = denied
    9. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Comments: But after the 2010, are people in Chicago allowed? Response: Yes, but not as freely as they should be. The 2010 McDonald case was preceded by the 2008 Heller case. The Heller case said that the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right, and that and individual can keep...
    10. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Related to this question, in the 2010 McDonald v. City of Chicago Supreme Court case the Court ruled that Second Amendment protections "...were enforceable against state governments, not just the federal government." This includes any state government, including state, county, city, town, etc...
    11. S

      SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

    12. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Interest balancing, prima facia. This is patently contrary to Bruen.
    13. S

      SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

      This was a really important addition to the legislation. Thank you for bringing it up in testimony before the House of Delegates committee. I believe that influenced the outcome.
    14. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Delayed = Denied
    15. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Delayed = Denied
    16. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Almost. Probably a honey do list weekend for him.
    17. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Delayed = Denied
    18. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Less than the number of days I've lived in Montgomery County since this law was passed. Delayed = Denied
    19. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Maybe we'll get lucky. Perhaps he's already caught his limit? Reached the end of the internet? Run out of money?
    20. S

      Montgomery County Bill 21-22

      Delayed = Denied
    Top Bottom