- Nov 11, 2009
- 30,956
Buffalo Bore has a preference for flat-nosed hard cast or wadcutter bullets (for the smaller calibers especially), and makes the case that they are more destructive of tissue than the more traditional round-nose bullets for these revolvers and smaller-caliber semi autos.
While avoiding the discussion that no one should be carrying anything less potent than a 9mm, it must be said that there are millions of guns in calibers from 32 through 9x18 Makarov, which might have some utility for personal defense, though their bullets lack the mass and velocity to offer expansion in tissue.
I'd be curious to learn whether their argument holds water in the real world.
Here's their argument regarding expansion vs hard-cast flat nosed bullets:
https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=60
Discussion of lead vs hard-cast:
https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=54
The site has a number of other interesting articles in the "Technical Articles" section:
https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=51
While avoiding the discussion that no one should be carrying anything less potent than a 9mm, it must be said that there are millions of guns in calibers from 32 through 9x18 Makarov, which might have some utility for personal defense, though their bullets lack the mass and velocity to offer expansion in tissue.
I'd be curious to learn whether their argument holds water in the real world.
Here's their argument regarding expansion vs hard-cast flat nosed bullets:
https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=60
Discussion of lead vs hard-cast:
https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=54
The site has a number of other interesting articles in the "Technical Articles" section:
https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=51