This is exactly what I mean - if we are facing an inevitable event and we have a possible option to prevent or restrict or limit it - we should take it.
Worst case scenario? Ballot measures fail. Best case? They don't.
Multiple measures could also be a solution. An initiative to ban...
The ban is passing anyway. And it is safe to assume the courts will uphold, at least on the state level, every single piece of it.
Submitting a ballot initiative to amend our state constitution to prevent limitations on magazines for example is not putting civil rights to a vote. It's another...
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22776136/colorado-ballot-proposal-aimed-at-undoing-ammunition-magazine
"Two Littleton men have filed a proposed ballot measure that seeks to undo proposed legislation that would limit ammunition magazines of more than 15 rounds."
Anyone here familiar...
Im selling a near complete one and a lot of ammo for it in classifieds for cheap if that helps. For a finished one in shop, 1600+ seems to be the cheapest.
If they are making clear good faith effort to comply with all regulations, Im willing to bet a lawsuit would fail, assuming you find an attorney who would touch it.
My view, this is like suing Walmart because you have to wait in line because you went shopping the day a storm hit.
Yes in WV you have more gun rights. For now. It will change.
But annual personal property taxes on you cars? Dogs? Every year?
Wages that are half what they are in MD?
Its not heaven.
Water is legal for now. But people drown...so it is only a matter of time before it gets "regulated". Why would we need pools? You only need cups to drink.
Recent conversation got me thinking - the massive anti-gun lobby won't stop with AR-15's and the like, we all know that.
So I'm trying to figure out what would be next. Handguns or shotguns? Handguns are extremely evil when you shoot them sideways in the city streets, but then again shotguns...