Recent content by mH3NO

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
    1. M

      Kolbe v O'Malley being Appealed to CA4

      The code I was referring to would just be a brute force calculation: pick 3 randomly from the group of 17 a billion times or so and output the percentage it met the 2+ req. It wouldn't help solve it analytically. The solution where you got ~20% over constrained the problem. It gave the odds...
    2. M

      Kolbe v O'Malley being Appealed to CA4

      I know this isn't a math forum, but I just read all this and the discussion went on so long I feel the need to post the right answer... so if anyone still cares: 45.59%. Not going to include a proof, but it can be validated with a few lines of code.
    Top Bottom