Recent content by jcutonilli

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
    1. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      The oral arguments for this case will occur today (Wed 20 March) at 9am. The link to these arguments can be found here
    2. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      It starts the clock for a response. If the state intends on filing a waiver or extension, it will likely appear on the docket a week or two before the response deadline. The response date for the state is 13 March
    3. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      It has been docketed by SCOTUS https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\23-863.html
    4. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      SCOTUS will not grant cert without a response. If someone waives a response, SCOTUS will request a response before granting cert.
    5. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      I suspect that they will waive the right to respond.
    6. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Frosh is no longer the AG. Anthony Brown is the AG and the case is now known as Bianchi v Brown.
    7. J

      Miller V Becerra

      It is official. They have held the case in abeyance pending the resolution of Duncan.
    8. J

      Miller V Becerra

      They stayed the district court opinion based on Duncan. It is an issue that was raised when CA appealed the district court opinion.
    9. J

      Miller V Becerra

      https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/live-oral-arguments/watch/?id=13288173404504
    10. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      yeah...ummm...YES. They livestream the audio. https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/oral-argument/listen-to-oral-arguments
    11. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      You are getting mixed up. This thread is about Bianchi aka AWB case (Kolbe 2.0) 4CA also took MSI v Brown en banc aka HQL the day before this one. For more info see https://www.marylandshallissue.org/jmain/counselor-s-corner/hqlsuit
    12. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      They vacated Bianchi, not Kolbe. The problem is that Kolbe affects Bianchi. They have not rejected anything because they have not issued any opinions. It appears they are going to address the Kolbe precedent en banc.
    13. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      I am not sure you understand what GVR means. It is simply SCOTUS asking the lower court to take a new look at a case based on new precedent. It does not mean that the case was wrong. The lower courts routinely come to the same conclusion. SCOTUS then can decide if they want to grant cert based...
    14. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      The Kolbe en banc took ~10 months to decide from oral argument
    15. J

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      It is tentatively scheduled for the March session
    Top Bottom