Recent content by Allen65

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. A

      NY ordered to answer to SCOTUS

      There's controversy because rich antis still don't want carry, or private possession, anywhere. The "Vampire Rule" was/is one of their key tools to achieve that, and they can afford to pay for the attorneys, media, and politicians who keep pushing for it.
    2. A

      Hoffman v Cali: non resident ccw suit started

      In order to have a split, we'd need a clear appellate win somewhere, wouldn't we? None of the states in the 2A-friendly appellate diatricts would pass any of these sorts of laws for us to challenge.
    3. A

      Hoffman v Cali: non resident ccw suit started

      I wonder if some Texans who wanted to CCW in Oregon would be able to demonstrate nexus in 5CA, so they could sue there rather than 9CA? There's no point filing suit in 9CA; the outcome would be predetermined.
    4. A

      Washington Supreme Court Blocks Judge’s Ruling That High-Capacity Mag Ban Is Unconstitutional

      It's an emergency stay, but a stay is only granted if the judge believes the requester is likely to eventually prevail on merits during appeal. So that judge is telegraphing how he/she will decide when/if the issue comes up in their appellate court.
    5. A

      2024 - SB-488 (HB-947) Gun Industry Accountability Act of 2024

      I guess Brown won't care that if Glock decides to stop doing business in this state, police departments where they're issue will be SOL for parts, service, and additional purchases? Yes, I know, rhetorical question.
    6. A

      Man Up Monday - Sine Die Edition

      It is wide open. The wording is such that it means whatever an anti-2A MDAG or or county State's Attorney can convince a anti-2A MD judge it means, with words like "reasonable", and "in the totality" sprinkled in to make sure there are no objective standards that must be met. Plus, it's a...
    7. A

      M1903 vs M1917

      M17 extracts better, until your ejector spring breaks. Had that happen during a match. It's almost like the Brits who designed the P14 forgot to design one on and added it as an afterthought once the machine drawings were done. "Oy! The ejector don' work!" "Bloody 'ell. Oh, let's just cut...
    8. A

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Next time give it to a staffer of one of the (few) 2A-friendly Senators or Delegates to see if they can get it into the building for you.
    9. A

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      I get the same blank look when I put a 5.56 cartridge on the table next to a 30-30, .308 and 30-06 asking which is the AR-15 cartridge and which are the most popular cartridges in the US for deer hunting. They inevitably pick the 30-06 as the super-killy AR round. It's even more fun if I add...
    10. A

      SELF DEFENSE AMMO - GUN SPECIFIC

      When he causes the recession that kills off the inflation.
    11. A

      Commonwealth v. Caetano

      Most of us saw this coming when Bruen was announced, having seen how lower courts and local jurisdictions have played passive-aggressive in complying with Heller, McDonald, Caetano, et al.. The jurisdictions that passed and maintain these laws won't give them up without a fight, regardless of...
    12. A

      Another Republican calling it quits

      Maybe he's just tired of having to work with self-destructive, narcissistic, idiots and has something else better to do with his life.
    13. A

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      I'd use a scatological word rather than "fireworks". :sad20: I guess best outcome from this hearing for us is they don't remand back down to Distract and actually write an opinion. But the real hope is in SCOTUS acting on the preliminary actions currently in front of them, even without a...
    14. A

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Worst case, Bruen should fix "new tech" as something that wasn't in existence when Bruen was decided. Nothing on MD's ban list was not in existence at the time of Bruen, except for the couple of guns that never were produced in the first place. Not that "new tech" should be an issue at...
    15. A

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      It's amazing how overt some of those judges are about how they think they, and the Party State can simply ignore the plain text of a SCOTUS decision. They're not even trying to airbrush a patina of compliance on their statements. Isn't there an appeal to SCOTUS on 4CA's denial of a PI still...
    See more
    Top Bottom