SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Doco Overboard

    Ultimate Member
    No one is saying you can't prevent someone from carrying in your home. We are just saying it should be your decision to do that for your own home not someone else's or the government's.
    Thanks for the thoughtful reply but I'm not really interested in what we says. And what I'm about to express is not directed at you as an individual.

    I cant imagine an intelligent, responsible, personally accountable grown man that wants to sneak a weapon up on anyone in their own home instead of just making a simple initial communication they're armed. Anyone that thinks or really just feels thats prohibiting to what some ass clown from the state house compels one to do and wants to carry their water on the governments behalf, has already lost.

    Otherwise, I'm not worried too much any longer for how some SB1 mental contortionist feels like what I need to think or act to calm they're nerves or for how to pave their way to constitutional shambammabush.
     

    Epiphany

    Member
    Feb 5, 2023
    30
    MoCo
    I read that like 5 times and it’s still nonsense…

    I don’t get it - if you never know the person is armed, what’s the difference?

    It’s not sneaking it if your intent isn’t nefarious - it’s just how you “carry” yourself every day… ”Sneaking” implies intent. Certainly the shoe on the other foot you’d feel your rights were being infringed.
     

    jc1240

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Sep 18, 2013
    14,953
    Westminster, MD
    I read that like 5 times and it’s still nonsense…

    I don’t get it - if you never know the person is armed, what’s the difference?

    It’s not sneaking it if your intent isn’t nefarious - it’s just how you “carry” yourself every day… ”Sneaking” implies intent. Certainly the shoe on the other foot you’d feel your rights were being infringed.
    I agree. No different than "sneaking" a sharp, pointy knife that is an EDC.
     

    Blacksmith101

    Grumpy Old Man
    Jun 22, 2012
    22,269
    It’s specific, it’s not vague, they can add they can clarify, but they cannot contradict what is specifically written in the act
    Except when they add things like the live fire requirement to the HQL permit process which was not in the act.
     

    rbird7282

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 6, 2012
    18,689
    Columbia
    I read that like 5 times and it’s still nonsense…

    I don’t get it - if you never know the person is armed, what’s the difference?

    It’s not sneaking it if your intent isn’t nefarious - it’s just how you “carry” yourself every day… ”Sneaking” implies intent. Certainly the shoe on the other foot you’d feel your rights were being infringed.

    Yep


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    gforce

    Active Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 22, 2018
    497
    We need a batch of young Heller wannabees. Get busted for an essentially unConstitutional law, get it to SCOTUS, and immortalize your name in history for as long as this nation still stands.

    If Smith is correct, there's pretty much zip to justify anti-gun legislation written after 1866.
    Hell's bells, there were privately owned and armed warships with letters of marque that had governmental permission to go forth and seize enemy shipping for private profit. If you can own a frigate, a machine gun is small beer. We have some fine traditions . . .

    Eventually, most of the nation's restrictive gun laws will go away. IMO, the sooner, the better.
    Maryland could do a booming buisness in frigates. Imagine the business and tax revenue privately held warship companies could bring to our coastal state.

    Maybe if we all pooled our duckets we could come up with the down payment on a constellation class guided missile frigate.
     

    Bob A

    όυ φροντισ
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 11, 2009
    30,925
    Maryland could do a booming buisness in frigates. Imagine the business and tax revenue privately held warship companies could bring to our coastal state.

    Maybe if we all pooled our duckets we could come up with the down payment on a constellation class guided missile frigate.
    It's only a worthwhile endeavor if we can get letters of marque. Also, there's probably little salvage value in anything successfully attacked by a guided missile frigate.

    State-sanctioned piracy must needs be supported by taking prizes. If simple destruction and death is the desired outcome, stick with the military; that's their job.
     

    44man

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 19, 2013
    10,145
    southern md
    I have thought about this my whole adult life

    Is gun control, like sb1 and the Montgomery county bill, prompted by complete irrational fear of guns? Or , what I actually think, is it about one group wanting complete control and an unarmed populace is easy to control? Or do these folks actually think people are safer when there are no guns?

    Where I was raised everyone was armed pretty much all the time so I figured it was normal so I have little to no fear of being around armed people and I think everyone is armed all the time even though I now know better.

    I also think about people talking about people carrying at work. What difference does it make?

    On a construction site everyone has a hammer or screwdriver or masons trowel or something that any one of them could very easily hurt or kill someone if they wanted.

    Hell, anyone getting gas at a gas station could easily enough make a hell of a mess with the gas nasel and a box lighter.

    It’s decency and civility and a person’s morals that keep us from killing each other, IMO.

    That’s just some stuff rattling around in my head
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,830
    Bel Air
    I have thought about this my whole adult life

    Is gun control, like sb1 and the Montgomery county bill, prompted by complete irrational fear of guns? Or , what I actually think, is it about one group wanting complete control and an unarmed populace is easy to control? Or do these folks actually think people are safer when there are no guns?

    Where I was raised everyone was armed pretty much all the time so I figured it was normal so I have little to no fear of being around armed people and I think everyone is armed all the time even though I now know better.

    I also think about people talking about people carrying at work. What difference does it make?

    On a construction site everyone has a hammer or screwdriver or masons trowel or something that any one of them could very easily hurt or kill someone if they wanted.

    Hell, anyone getting gas at a gas station could easily enough make a hell of a mess with the gas nasel and a box lighter.

    It’s decency and civility and a person’s morals that keep us from killing each other, IMO.

    That’s just some stuff rattling around in my head
    They are in denial about what heinous creatures many people are and the senseless violence those creatures are willing to perpetrate on their fellow man.
     

    DealeBill

    Member
    Nov 22, 2021
    13
    They are in denial about what heinous creatures many people are and the senseless violence those creatures are willing to perpetrate on their fellow man.
    They are also in denial that humans will use anything available. I lived in the Dominican Republic and watched people fight with machetes since it was all they had. I find most generally want the same thing--safety for our children. They just have very different, unworkable, and totally irrational ways to get to the goal.
     

    44man

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 19, 2013
    10,145
    southern md
    They are in denial about what heinous creatures many people are and the senseless violence those creatures are willing to perpetrate on their fellow man.
    Yep

    I know and have known people that I do not turn my back on, ever. I prefer not to be inside with them so I make a point to keep away from them.

    There are people who are worse than animals.

    But because I know those people it doesn’t make me scared of everyone nor does it make me believe everyone should be disarmed because other people are worse than animals.

    It’s the irrational fear of guns that I don’t understand. I guess that’s what it is.

    I mean a man can get 20 gallons of gas or alcohol and dump it around someone’s house or under the door of their office or into a store and do a horrible thing. So why aren’t the hoplophobes scared of that?

    I am doing to much thinking this morning
     

    DealeBill

    Member
    Nov 22, 2021
    13
    Did you sail on one? If so which and when? They did an engine swap years and years ago unsure if the air clutches are still a thing
    Sailed on ones 5 feet shorter that rode a whole lot better. 23 years of service. Just collecting the checks... They did change the air clutches. It was a great platform.
     

    Harrys

    Short Round
    Jul 12, 2014
    3,423
    SOMD
    210s ride like corks and no one knows how to fix the air clutches anymore...
    I was stationed on the CGC Active back in the day and yes, they are a cork in the water. The biggest issues we had was clutching in the gas turbines with the diesel engines. We use to adjust the air clutches all the time. The biggest problem in adjusting the clutches was the pneumatic actuator's speed and distance. In today's world adding a pneumatic adjustable transducer between the actuator and the supply air will resolve any issues and make the adjustments very simple.
     

    Apd09

    Active Member
    May 30, 2013
    975
    Westminster, MD
    Yep

    I know and have known people that I do not turn my back on, ever. I prefer not to be inside with them so I make a point to keep away from them.

    There are people who are worse than animals.

    But because I know those people it doesn’t make me scared of everyone nor does it make me believe everyone should be disarmed because other people are worse than animals.

    It’s the irrational fear of guns that I don’t understand. I guess that’s what it is.

    I mean a man can get 20 gallons of gas or alcohol and dump it around someone’s house or under the door of their office or into a store and do a horrible thing. So why aren’t the hoplophobes scared of that?

    I am doing to much thinking this morning

    It’s guns because of gun violence. Major cities are unsafe. Kids in school are unsafe. Elderly in the grocery store are unsafe. People at a concert are unsafe.

    It’s easier to put your head in the sand and say it’s guns than to address poverty in the city, hatred from a community for orientation, mental health problems, domestic terrorism, racism, etc…

    There’s an old adage, if you tell a lie long enough you start to believe it’s the truth.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    Bertfish

    Throw bread on me
    Mar 13, 2013
    17,662
    White Marsh, MD
    I was stationed on the CGC Active back in the day and yes, they are a cork in the water. The biggest issues we had was clutching in the gas turbines with the diesel engines. We use to adjust the air clutches all the time. The biggest problem in adjusting the clutches was the pneumatic actuator's speed and distance. In today's world adding a pneumatic adjustable transducer between the actuator and the supply air will resolve any issues and make the adjustments very simple.
    I'm sure you know the turbines and Paxmans are long gone

    Alco 16V 251s now
     

    scottyfz6

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 22, 2018
    1,377
    I also think about people talking about people carrying at work. What difference does it make?

    On a construction site everyone has a hammer or screwdriver or masons trowel or something that any one of them could very easily hurt or kill someone if they wanted.
    I am on a job site in Baltimore 2 or 3 days a week for an hour or two. I carry every day, my foreman carries when he leaves the job, and has a lock box in his gang box that I provided for it. The GC also carries daily.

    No one has been shot on the job yet, and almost no one knows we carry.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,424
    Messages
    7,281,148
    Members
    33,451
    Latest member
    SparkyKoT

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom