SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

[Odarlin1]

Agreed!

Always in lock step with the Party in effort to secure its support for the next election

 

[Odarlin1]

That right there is funny. I need some of what you’re smoking.

We all do afte that mess!

 

[Biggfoot44]

They are absolutely passing this in spite of Bruen. The Chair just said an hour ago he wished we had a different supreme court. These people are such liars.

Oh , plenty of lies over the course of the session and the SJC proceedings . The the quoted topics above , they're telling the truth .

Actually , not just IN Spite of Bruen , but TO Spite Bruen .

 

[Odarlin1]

Well, you called that.

Good luck with this moving forward!

Ha! I know these bitches! I did battle with them and they can never be trusted.

 

[RFBfromDE]

Of course, for everyone stating see you in court, remember we are at, what 100 days or so, for MoCo to consider PI/TRO? If you think we will get anything immediate you are crazier than walnut licker himself. Immediate, for anything 2A related that’s not an instant slam dunk against us, will take months just to get told no PI/TRO then years for the trial.

Name-calling is silly and childish.

Also;

 

[Ap5fan]

We have NY/NJ cases being heard soon, if that goes for our way it should make everything else much easier and quicker.

Of course, for everyone stating see you in court, remember we are at, what 100 days or so, for MoCo to consider PI/TRO? If you think we will get anything immediate you are crazier than walnut licker himself. Immediate, for anything 2A related that’s not an instant slam dunk against us, will take months just to get told no PI/TRO then years for the trial.

 

[BUFF7MM]

Who was the 3? Mc Kay?

McKay voted no

 

[King Chicken]

So when does this thing take effect? And what does it mean for concealed carry exactly....you cant take it into a business without express approval from owner? Even though i try to keep up there is so much b.s. im getting confused.

 

[2112rws]

Does this mean I can't carry when I go shopping and to a resturant this Friday?

 

[Biggfoot44]

Most never pay attention to votes by their legislators only the rhetoric they throw out at election time which is only lip service. And then they vote the name they know. Stay informed and keep others informed of voting records.

And even moreso their Committee and Procedural Votes even more than Floor Votes .

 

[Ap5fan]

So when does this thing take effect? And what does it mean for concealed carry exactly....you cant take it into a business without express approval from owner? Even though i try to keep up there is so much b.s. im getting confused.

it has not passed yet it made it out of committee. Still has a way to go, but if passed and signed into law Oct 1 would be the day it starts

 

[BUFF7MM]

So when does this thing take effect? And what does it mean for concealed carry exactly....you cant take it into a business without express approval from owner? Even though i try to keep up there is so much b.s. im getting confused.

It would go into effect October 1st if it passes both the Senate and the House and is signed by the Governor. Today was just a vote to sent it to the Senate floor for a vote by all the Senators.

 

[Biggfoot44]

Damn right it is. This bill is a mess in addition to being blatantly unconstitutional.

Not Only Unconstitutional , not only Bad Policy , but lacking internal logic or coherence .

 

[shershot99]

So stupid question but why didn’t anyone specifically call smith out as to why this had to move today? I have the same question. Why today and not tomorrow or next week??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[shershot99]

So stupid question but why didn’t anyone specifically call smith out as to why this had to move today? I have the same question. Why today and not tomorrow or next week??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Meaning, what or who is pushing him?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Rickman]

I almost wish I hadn't watched that. That red-headed girlie boi needs beat about the head and shoulders with a rubber hose, but now thinking about it further...he would probably enjoy it.

 

[Ap5fan]

Meaning, what or who is pushing him?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Time.

 

[dcam1075]

Well that was interesting

I wish the proposers/sponsors would consider or attempt to view this bill from this vantage point.

This bill directly and ONLY targets trained, law abiding citizens. Not criminals. Full stop. Let that sink in.
So, for every location the bill is proposing to prohibit, view the prohibition as the removal of trained, law abiding citizens from being able to effectively defend themselves and others. Leaving these locations open for only criminals to operate within. Now, explain how that makes us safer?

The way I know we are truly living in bizarro world is at the same time SB1 is being pushed through to remove the right for law abiding citizens to defend themselves we also have HB1180 being pushed that would remove the ability to convict anyone under the age of 25 from being convicted of 1st degree murder. So, we are effectively ensuring that the most violent criminal offenders spend the least amount of time incarcerated as possible while simultaneously removing the ability for the law abiding citizenry to protect themselves.

What could possibly go wrong??

 

[Bertfish]

Sigh... time to leave MD

Please for the love of God stop with overtures like this folks

It came out of committee

Facebook-level legal analysis is not a language this forum should speak. There's plenty of good knowledge around here to learn how the process actually works

 

[Blacksmith101]

What was Waldstreicher's third fanciful and unconstitutional criteria?

1. Heightened emotions
2. Diminished capacities
3. ?
4. Comparative time-space burden

What was the third one?

3. Adversarial Competition

5. Sensitive Content

These are at time stamp 1:40 on the video.