SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • dblas

    Past President, MSI
    MDS Supporter
    Apr 6, 2011
    13,105
    Do we have confirmation of this? The pdf up on MSI is still the original.
    It will remain the original bill until the hearing and then a committee voting session where the first chance at amendments are provided (unless the sponsor(s) offer amendments at the hearing).
     

    Occam

    Not Even ONE Indictment
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 24, 2018
    20,396
    Montgomery County
    Imagine if George Washington Stopped after he wrote a sternly worded letter and imagine if he asked to speak in court to get his point across and change their mind.
    George Washington fought a war to establish a new government that includes three evenly balanced branches that we just saw prevail - using stern words! - in court, in Bruen. I’m glad Washington didn’t stop until that goal was achieved - and now we have that tool to use. Which we’re watching happen right on 2A matters before our eyes.
     

    lazarus

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 23, 2015
    13,728
    I have not read all 350 posts so I don't know if it has not already been brought up but doesn't SB-1 violate the constitution on the separation of Church and State when a state Bill or law says I cannot carry in a Synagogue, Church or Mosque. If a Rabbi says I can carry within the confines of the Synagogue and its properties, the government cannot have any say in that. Or, am I thinking wrong? I was thinking about that when the piece of chit Waldwhatever walked past the Patriot Picket on Monday.
    Not really going to apply. Otherwise things like “murder is wrong” wouldn’t apply in churches or their grounds either. Unless you attend the church of the gun and the prophet John Moses Browning had preached you must carry a firearm to properly worship. Then you might have an argument in court. Otherwise the government is not infringing on your right to free exercise of religion.

    It’s wrong for government to ban it for other reasons though.
     

    MJD438

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 28, 2012
    5,854
    Somewhere in MD
    It will remain the original bill until the hearing and then a committee voting session where the first chance at amendments are provided (unless the sponsor(s) offer amendments at the hearing).
    And, if all goes as normal, the sponsor will simply get up and say "here's my bill, we are completely changing it, but the documentation is not ready at this time" and the committee will hear testimony on a bill that looks nothing like the one they know they are going to vote upon...
     

    Blacksmith101

    Grumpy Old Man
    Jun 22, 2012
    22,269
    Not really going to apply. Otherwise things like “murder is wrong” wouldn’t apply in churches or their grounds either. Unless you attend the church of the gun and the prophet John Moses Browning had preached you must carry a firearm to properly worship. Then you might have an argument in court. Otherwise the government is not infringing on your right to free exercise of religion.

    It’s wrong for government to ban it for other reasons though.
    Churches are beyond the purview of the government because they are not one of the five sensitive places so banning carry is unconstitutional, unless the government can find a suitable historical analog.
     

    lazarus

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 23, 2015
    13,728
    Churches are beyond the purview of the government because they are not one of the five sensitive places so banning carry is unconstitutional, unless the government can find a suitable historical analog.
    I wasn’t claiming they could ban carry there. But it isn’t because of any separation or church and state or free exercise of religion reasons. Because 2A and no historical analogs.
     

    Deep Lurker

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Mar 22, 2019
    2,365
    We adopted the yellow star symbol in this SB1 fight with reverent respect, because we are all endangered, but one group of innocents is clearly endangered now, and will be, more so, if this passes as is.

    H/T our own MigraineMan for taking our story national.

    ICYMI:



    049099E9-D5AC-4CB4-BDDF-B439BBEE2611.jpeg
     

    Deep Lurker

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Mar 22, 2019
    2,365
    We adopted the yellow star symbol in this SB1 fight with reverent respect, because we are all endangered, but one group of innocents is clearly endangered now, and will be, more so, if this passes as is.

    H/T our own MigraineMan for taking our story national.

    ICYMI:



    View attachment 400071

    From the West Coast version of
    Maryland, only three days ago.

    Exhibit A:



    81DA94DB-A1BE-4885-95E3-167CEAA1800E.jpeg
    71BDA2AC-864C-4D5A-B89C-9D631FA166C3.jpeg
    28C86EA9-20FC-4ECF-B51B-556A170B37E4.jpeg
    84F22749-1BFA-40E6-B591-44FA810C3F8E.jpeg


    Evidently fired blank rounds.

    Yet, what WaldstriKKKer intends, whether blanks or real, it will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
     

    Bertfish

    Throw bread on me
    Mar 13, 2013
    17,662
    White Marsh, MD
    From the West Coast version of
    Maryland, only three days ago.

    Exhibit A:



    View attachment 400125 View attachment 400126 View attachment 400127 View attachment 400128

    Evidently fired blank rounds.

    Yet, what WaldstriKKKer intends, whether blanks or real, it will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
    New sign

    WaldstriKKKer disarms minorities
     

    Allen65

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 29, 2013
    7,154
    Anne Arundel County
    I'm not sure I understand the logic of passing it so we can fight it for 8 to 9 years.
    We should be able to get a TRO and PI pretty quickly, given what's happened in NJ and what's likely to happen when 2CA is forced to uphold the district court decision in Antonyuk under the threat of SCOTUS beatdown made in Alito's statement when SCOTUS didn't remove 2CA's stay on procedural grounds.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,424
    Messages
    7,281,101
    Members
    33,451
    Latest member
    SparkyKoT

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom