- Jan 30, 2013
- 34,023
It would surprise me if they aren't.It would not surprise me if NY, MD, CA all are colluding on the end around of the ruling.
It would surprise me if they aren't.It would not surprise me if NY, MD, CA all are colluding on the end around of the ruling.
It would not surprise me if NY, MD, CA all are colluding on the end around of the ruling.
Don't worry about Pittman playing footsie with Everytown. We AACO voters are a surly lot this year and will likely be tossing him out of office this November, at least at long as the GOP doesn't end up with an unelectable candidate from the primary.State AGs all talk. Politics and power over people, always. Don’t forget special interest groups either. Everytown and Brady coordinate with governments as well.
Look no further than the amicus briefs in these gun cases. Locally, Everytown has hopped into helping Anne Arundel county in MSI’s litigation against them. They’re also involved with shaping policy in Baltimore with the Baltimore Police Department (another reason this city will never see its police defunded). Brady has their attorneys helping Baltimore sue Polymer80 and Hanover Armory.
There is no smackdown coming.. SCOTUS has no means to force a state to comply if the DOJ refuses to do it.. the current D9J would laugh in the justices face.. there is nothing that can be done .Amazing . A law intemded not only to effectively end an enumerated constitutional right, but one passed purely as an act of malice against both the prevailing party in a suit against the state and against the court that rendered the judgement. The smackdown will be epic, if not fast, because what the NY Governor and legislature just did are a direct attack on rule of.law and the authority of the Federal judiciary.
There is no smackdown coming.. SCOTUS has no means to force a state to comply if the DOJ refuses to do it.. the current D9J would laugh in the justices face.. there is nothing that can be done .
Not quite the way it works. SCOTUS doesn't get directly involved in sending people to jail for civil contempt; the lower courts handle that as they issue orders based on SCOTUS guidance. If an individual defied a District or Appellate Court order, the Court would direct the US Marshalls Service, which serves as the enforcement arm of the Federal Judiciary, to take them into custody and hold them until they comply with the Court's direction. The Court can also levy fines for every day the subject fails to comply.There is no smackdown coming.. SCOTUS has no means to force a state to comply if the DOJ refuses to do it.. the current D9J would laugh in the justices face.. there is nothing that can be done .
There is no smackdown coming.. SCOTUS has no means to force a state to comply if the DOJ refuses to do it.. the current D9J would laugh in the justices face.. there is nothing that can be done .
There can't be any push back if no one is willing to push. Joe Biden's DOJ certainly isn't going to do it...and there is no way WE THE PEOPLE are getting off our collective asses..As you have seen here few if any are actually willing to take up arms to defend their rights.Obama regularly ignored court orders he didn't like and nothing happened to him. Current non-conservative office holders probably believe they can expect the same lack of legal pushback.
Why haven't you then? Most of us have families and lives outside 2a. We aren't going to be labeled extremist and nut jobs when theres legit avenues to correct bad political decisions.There can't be any push back if no one is willing to push. Joe Biden's DOJ certainly isn't going to do it...and there is no way WE THE PEOPLE are getting off our collective asses..As you have seen here few if any are actually willing to take up arms to defend their rights.
18 United States Code, Section 241: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or....They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten yearsNew York's bad faith statute is not unlike passing a statute to revoke women's right to vote, or to negate the Fifth Amendment, or to legalize slavery. Aside from their ridiculous unconstitutionality, what blowback would there be to those who do that?
18 United States Code, Section 241: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or....They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years
There's the answer. Although a case could be made for 18 USC Section 2383: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Now, will Crooked Dementia Joe act? No. A President Trump might. President DeSantis might. Me? The only question would be whether or not to treat this as a law enforcement issue, or a military issue.
Pols at all levels across the land do that every day, sometimes multiple times a day.18 United States Code, Section 241: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or....They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years
There's the answer. Although a case could be made for 18 USC Section 2383: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Now, will Crooked Dementia Joe act? No. A President Trump might. President DeSantis might. Me? The only question would be whether or not to treat this as a law enforcement issue, or a military issue.
Pols at all levels across the land do that every day, sometimes multiple times a day.
Instead of defunding the police, we should be defunding the pols.
The Supreme Court could declare Maryland Constitutional Carry and half the posters on this forum still wouldn’t carry, they are THAT scared of the police in your state
There can't be any push back if no one is willing to push. Joe Biden's DOJ certainly isn't going to do it...and there is no way WE THE PEOPLE are getting off our collective asses..As you have seen here few if any are actually willing to take up arms to defend their rights.
Peter Clemenza approvesGoing to the mattresses already (again)?
A mighty maze! But not without a plan.
So, your saying roll over and play dead? That is how this state got this way. Did you really think individuals like this were going to just roll over? There is a lot wrong with what they passed; the social media account is one of them.We said the same thing about Heller. Didn't happen, won't happen. 2nd Circuit is openly hostile towards 2nd Amendment rights and that did not change with Bruen. Fortunately, if you want to carry the answer is easy....move. For Marylanders, you all should understand the 4th circuit could care less about "consistutional muster". In their mind Heller, McDonald, and Bruen are illegitmate excercises in academic philosophy and not Supreme Court precedent that should be taken seriously.
All NYSRPA managed to do was kick the hornet's nest.