IMHO, the standard 16 hour training requirement was set by someone in the General Assembly as a class for citizens who had ZERO handgun knowledge, skills, experience or marksmanship skills.I'm going to get shit on from some (not all) of the instructors here, I still believe that between the HQL training requirements and the Utah class, I have learned everything that should be required for a MD W&C. I don't need nor will I sit through 16 hours of remedial training of handgun basics followed by time fillers of example scenarios, anecdotes, personal experiences, whatever. I'd be willing to take a reasonable exam with upon passing would waive the bulk of the classroom portion. I have no problem with the live fire requirements, but I shouldn't need more than an hour at most of range time for it. I'll take an advanced pistol course if I feel like I need hours of range instruction. For a completely new shooter, sure, the current 16 hour requirement is great. Handgun safety rules, the whole "this is the grip" basic stuff, how to choose a weapon, cleaning & maintenance, holster and concealment, and more time on the range learning technique.
Before you go worrying about Yosemite Brute going out in public strapped, it's highly unlikely I'm going to attempt to get a permit anytime soon. I just strongly feel that the requirements have way less to do with teaching competence than just being yet another obstacle.
MSP requires it for one reason- it’s required by law.
There is another, more useful alternative. Take the NRA Basic Pistol Instructor course, or the USCCA instructor class. Become listed as an MSP QHIC and you achieve two objectives. 1) you become training exempt and 2) you become qualified to TEACH the 16 hr HGP course.