- May 15, 2007
- 24,556
The right has to play the game by the same set of rules the left plays by. Otherwise we are nothing but morally and ethically superior losers. And as we go, so goes the country.
Whatever it takes. At this point.
The right has to play the game by the same set of rules the left plays by. Otherwise we are nothing but morally and ethically superior losers. And as we go, so goes the country.
Partisan gerrymanders disenfranchise voters, and that should make everyone mad regardless of who those disenfranchised Americans may vote for.
I get that you *think* it’s true that this is asymmetric partisan shenanigans by Democrats and that it is “tinkering” at the margins, but respectfully, you are misinformed on both points.Even if you ascribe to the " everybody does it " concept , more usually it is a degree of semi plausibly tinkering around the edges .
The worst offenders are generally Dems .
Maryland was already the worst in the country before this , turning a legitimate 60 ish % into 80% . Now , it will become essentially 100% .
maybe its just me, but I always felt district lines should always end at a county line. Why because then voting precinct's do not become confusing.
Pulling this livestream link onto this thread page.
Testimony about the GOOD map has concluded.
Testimony for and AGAINST the corrupt Democrat map continues now for HB1.
Desperate attempts to rationalize (“I feel”) joining Annapolis to the Eastern Shore are astonishing to hear.
Anal-politians who moved to the Eastern Shore to improve their quality of life now want to be tied back to the City. Twilight Zone stuff.
As much as I dislike having to agree with Dread Chief Justice Roberts, he is correct in the SCOTUS opinion. It belongs at the State level.
That said, I am still cheesed that the Governor's gerrymandering committee was tainted by two individuals who turned out to be ineligible. Rather than invalidating their work, the committee just forged ahead after they resigned. Boonch of crap, that was. Pissed me off because I threw my hat into the ring to be on the committee and was not selected over the ineligible clowns. That's when I knew the fix was in.
Besides, the Maryland General Assembly rules with an iron fist inside a cactus glove. They're never going to relinquish power.
I’ll give you two:
Kansas. 31/69 D/R split, carved up to make all 4 congressional districts solid R seats. Previously KS-4 leaned D regularly.
Nebraska. 28/72 D/R split. 3 of 3 solid red. NE-2 used to be competitive.
The worst state gerrymanders arguably aren’t the ones where minority party seats are driven to zero. They’re the ones where the most seats change hands based on diluting votes by how the districts are drawn. It’s called the “efficiency gap” in districting speak. By that standard, NC, PA, lead the charge with +3 R seats each. TX and MI are the next tier at +2 R seats and NY is +2 D.
NC, PA, and TX districts were actually intended to be *even more* heavily partisan gerrymanders, but those were thrown out by courts. The new TX map would be the worst example in the country, with 13 formerly competitive districts sliced up so that 3 are safe D and 10 are safe R.
There are plenty of bad example of D gerrymandering too, MD being one of them.
My point is not that MD’s map (new or old) is fair—it’s not. My point is that both parties do it. It’s not really an opinion; this stuff is all objective, measurable data and there’s an entire body of political science dedicated to it.
Neither party makes a big secret of it either because it’s not illegal.
The redistricting we’re talking about is for Congressional districts, not state legislative districts.
MD is roughly 2:1 D:R and the General Assembly is almost exactly that same composition. As far as I can tell, the redistricting isn’t changing that.
Why are these libtards in Annapolis doing this? In short, for the same reason a dog licks its balls, because they can...
I see all the commie site trolls have stopped putting digits at the end of their usernames..