May be the most biased thing I’ve ever read.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...rce=twitter&utm_campaign=SciAm_&sf209438140=1
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...rce=twitter&utm_campaign=SciAm_&sf209438140=1
Scientific American jumped the SJW Shark years ago. They’ve abandoned any pretense of objectivity, and are now 100% USDA academia pandering, with all the baggage that goes with that orientation.
Three percent of the population now owns half of the country’s firearms
Reading that, I have a sudden urge to go out and buy another gun
Strange, isn't it?
As usual a 600 person sampling for a poll is dismal. Lets try 60,000.
The bottom 2 rows of pistols in their pic are FiveseveNs, makes me want one even more!
May be the most biased thing I’ve ever read.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...rce=twitter&utm_campaign=SciAm_&sf209438140=1
Three percent of the population now owns half of the country’s firearms, says a recent, definitive study from the Injury Control Research Center at Harvard University."
Hmmm I can see where data can be really skewed. Lemme see, Babies and kids not old enough to shoot, umm Drug Cartels, Illegal aliens gang bangers and the Mob, hmm the percentages of technically unable to own a gun or even count ones they have in their diapers or wherever. I am sort of making a point ...
Ok wow, I barely got past the first paragraph or so. Reading on....."
Scientific American is now dead to me. I don't think I've opened and read that rag for any reason in 30 years. Now, I have a reason to never again. That's the way this white man rolls.
May be the most biased thing I’ve ever read.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...rce=twitter&utm_campaign=SciAm_&sf209438140=1