Arisaka with interesting markings

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • budman93

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 1, 2013
    5,284
    Frederick County
    I have what might be an interesting one for collectors of Japanese rifles. A relative of mine owns this gun and today I was able to take a good look at it and get some pictures. It is clearly an Arisaka of some kind and I know the veteran who brought it back from the Pacific. What is strange about it is the turned down bolt handle and the anchor where I would expect to find a mum or the remnants of a mum. Could it be a navy gun? I haven't been able to find any info on arisakas marked with anchors. I don't know a whole lot about the Japanese guns so I would appreciate any info you might have. (In case you can't tell, I obscured the last digit of the serial number, it isn't a 3 digit gun).
     

    Attachments

    • P1050650.jpg
      P1050650.jpg
      65.5 KB · Views: 312
    • P1050651 - Copy.jpg
      P1050651 - Copy.jpg
      60.5 KB · Views: 305
    • P1050652.jpg
      P1050652.jpg
      114.1 KB · Views: 305
    • P1050653.jpg
      P1050653.jpg
      99.1 KB · Views: 298
    • P1050654.jpg
      P1050654.jpg
      79.5 KB · Views: 301
    • P1050655.jpg
      P1050655.jpg
      111.4 KB · Views: 300
    • P1050656.jpg
      P1050656.jpg
      123.1 KB · Views: 319
    • P1050657.jpg
      P1050657.jpg
      65.4 KB · Views: 313
    • P1050658.jpg
      P1050658.jpg
      102.6 KB · Views: 305
    • P1050659.jpg
      P1050659.jpg
      97.8 KB · Views: 317

    Machodoc

    Old Guy
    Jun 27, 2012
    5,745
    Just South of Chuck County
    I'm guessing there are plenty of them at the bottom after the battle of Leyte Gulf :innocent0

    Yeah ... but pitted more than even Kroil can fix. A friend was diving on a Japanese "Kate" many years ago, and reached under the pilot's seat. There was a Nambu there. He was tempted to hold onto it, but since he was part of a scientific dive team doing surveys, his ethics kicked in and he put it back. He said that it still looked good enough that he could easily tell it was a Nambu, but that's about it.
     

    Machodoc

    Old Guy
    Jun 27, 2012
    5,745
    Just South of Chuck County
    I have what might be an interesting one for collectors of Japanese rifles. A relative of mine owns this gun and today I was able to take a good look at it and get some pictures. It is clearly an Arisaka of some kind and I know the veteran who brought it back from the Pacific. What is strange about it is the turned down bolt handle and the anchor where I would expect to find a mum or the remnants of a mum. Could it be a navy gun?

    I really like that one!
     

    budman93

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 1, 2013
    5,284
    Frederick County
    Looks like someone took the black finish off the receiver, refinished the stock, and bent the bolt.

    Could be but I'm thinking it must have been done before pickup. I know the veteran who brought it back (along with several other rifles and pistols that were given away years ago), his son-in-law (My uncle) has it now and neither one of them have ever done anything with it. It's been sitting for years.
     

    budman93

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 1, 2013
    5,284
    Frederick County
    I agree, looks like a Type 99 Navy Special. A little outside my span of Arisaka knowledge, but Mawkie or KH195 should chime in shortly.

    Here's another page of information. Scroll 3/4 down.

    http://www.carbinesforcollectors.com/arisakatype99page.html

    So according to this article the receivers of these are cast iron and should not be fired. That is good to know.

    Some other sources say that they are ok due to the way the lugs are designed to lock into recesses machined into the barrel to avoid putting any stress on the stock. But still probably best not to shoot it.
     

    MilsurpDan

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 1, 2012
    2,217
    Frederick County
    I didn't think the stock looked like it had been refinished.

    I don't think it's refinished either due to the stock markings and paint. If I remember right, a lot of the trainers have a polyurethane looking finish which is correct. My Type 02/45 has the same looking finish. I had thought bubba put a poorly applied coat of poly on it, but some of the big Japanese collectors on Gunboards told me it was original.
     

    JohnnyE

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 18, 2013
    9,638
    MoCo
    Yeah ... but pitted more than even Kroil can fix. A friend was diving on a Japanese "Kate" many years ago, and reached under the pilot's seat. There was a Nambu there. He was tempted to hold onto it, but since he was part of a scientific dive team doing surveys, his ethics kicked in and he put it back. He said that it still looked good enough that he could easily tell it was a Nambu, but that's about it.

    When I first read that part, I pictured him diving on the Kate in a Hellcat.
     

    budman93

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 1, 2013
    5,284
    Frederick County
    I don't think it's refinished either due to the stock markings and paint. If I remember right, a lot of the trainers have a polyurethane looking finish which is correct. My Type 02/45 has the same looking finish. I had thought bubba put a poorly applied coat of poly on it, but some of the big Japanese collectors on Gunboards told me it was original.

    My understanding so far is that this is not a trainer. The trainers that I have seen have generally been fairly crude and with smoothbores. This one is rifled and from what I have read, even with the cast iron receiver, was intended to be a working rifle with the redesigned locking lugs to take all the stress off of the receiver.
     

    MilsurpDan

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 1, 2012
    2,217
    Frederick County
    My understanding so far is that this is not a trainer. The trainers that I have seen have generally been fairly crude and with smoothbores. This one is rifled and from what I have read, even with the cast iron receiver, was intended to be a working rifle with the redesigned locking lugs to take all the stress off of the receiver.

    Oh I know. I was just speaking in general terms about the stock. The Type 02/45 stocks were made from Navy Trainers so that's what I was referring too.
     

    KH195

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 10, 2013
    1,553
    Virginia
    I'm late to the game on this one (been traveling), but great gun budman! Indeed a Naval "Special Type" 99 and nice example of a true late war / last ditch gun. This variation of T99 is very sought after in the Japanese collecting community. Production likely started in 1944 and was believed to have been made at training rifle facilities at Yokosuka Naval Arsenal.

    Data on these is sparse in the book Military Rifles of Japan, seems there weren't many examples available at the time to get good data on serial ranges/ features. Looks like that one falls into the "early" feature category, but the serial number is right around the time features started changing (the serial number is actually the number on the right, the number to the left is like an assembly number used for matching parts).

    As metalman mentioned, I too have a little bit of doubt that the gun stands now as issued. To my knowledge all rifles had the black paint applied, and aside from the designated snipers, bolt handles were not turned down on issued guns. The finish does look strange as well, but as you mentioned we are talking end of the war so anything is definitely possible! Do you know the circumstances under which the vet acquired it? If he didn't make any changes to it himself it's possible another vet modified/customized it then traded/sold it before coming back to the states. As for the markings on the stock, the two rightmost characters are "3" and "2". The one on the left, at least from what I see at a quick glance at my books could either be the kana symbol "fu" as used to designate 32nd series on Toyo Koygo rifles or a Jinsen Arsenal plant inspection mark. Since neither one of those would make sense on this gun, it could very easily have another meaning as well! I would recommend posting it up over in the Japanese section on Gunboards if you have an account there, those guys are the real experts and could tell you exactly what is/is not original on it. Great and VERY hard to find gun either way!
     

    KH195

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 10, 2013
    1,553
    Virginia
    Follow up - are there any proof marks on the underside of the stock rear of the trigger guard assembly and tang? Usually there is at least an anchor proof on these. Could help determine if the finish/stock has been messed with.
     
    Jul 1, 2012
    5,739
    I thought I'd actually get to use my newly acquired Type 99 book but it just mentions these rifles were covered "extensively" in another Banzai project book. Doh!
    Definitely a hard one to come by, and also heartily recommend posting some pics on Gunboards as KH195 suggested, as it may add to knowledge.
    Especially good closeups of any/all markings.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,604
    Messages
    7,288,134
    Members
    33,487
    Latest member
    Mikeymike88

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom