- Mar 8, 2013
- 6,993
I don't think so.
The two tenured members changed their tune after the license was brought up. For some reason, Knuab did not know he had the license, but the board did.
Knaub claimed not to have it, and it wasn't relevant because the applicant didn't claim a business purpose in the application, but the Board had a copy in their file (?), and the appellant had another copy with him. That was the interesting thing. The g&s morphed right before our eyes during the hearing.
Knaub was not concerned with the dollar amounts, but the applicant was to provide documentation of the accounts/taxes. Whatever the applicant can provide to establish finanacial busniess dealings regardless of $ amount.
Last edited: