AliasNeo07
Ultimate Member
Quick look at it by MAC (who says it's looking like it'll cost less than a Tavor).
I watched this the other day too. I have to say it does look awesome.
Quick look at it by MAC (who says it's looking like it'll cost less than a Tavor).
standard size model as well, might be a better option for guys who want a ful size AKish rifle in MD
Ugly sucker but form follows function, etc. I like it. The improvements have promise.
Even had the Israeli stock setup on the one pictured - I wonder if they'll sell those separately.
I wonder how well that poly magwell will stand up to rocking in steel mags over the years?
Besides the stock I like the looks of it. I wonder how difficult it would be to switch it out? Im sure if it takes off someone is gonna jump on making aftermarket stuff. Some of the CAA and FAB defense stuff has a cheap look to it though. No matter what ill be in line to get one. Awesome news.
Should not be an issue. Not all polymers are equal and this is not Tapco crap.
This rifle has already been adopted by Colombia, Chile, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Peru, South Sudan, Ukraine, and Vietnam so it is already a proven system considering most of those places are warzones with extreme climates. Peru, Ukraine, and Vietnam are going to build them under license. If this rifle was truly a POS they would not have bought it and stuck with their AK's/whatever they were using.
The ACE is not some Bushmaster ACR, SIG 556, or Remington R51 that was just flung on the market with no track record and questionable QC.
That top rail would have to come off
You're not being a purist when you take one rifle and try to make it into a different one. The Galil ACE is not the original Galil, and doesn't even look like it with modified furniture due to the receiver and sight differences. What you're describing is basically like buying an AK-105 to make it look like an AKM... it's something that should turn the stomach of a purist, not excite them.I would have to try and make one of these as close to the original Galil as I could get it. Again, that pesky purist in me.
Looked like you could unscrew it from the topcover, but not so sure about the gas tube. IMHO, neither is all that optimal for an optic mount.
I am undecided about whether I'd trust the gas tube or topcover mount more. The Israelis understood that the original Galil had issues with the rear sight being topcover-mounted and shifting, so I'm wondering if the ACE's dovetail rail connection is an effort to make the whole system a little more solid and repeatable.
IMHO, the better solution would have been to modify the receiver design so that it went all the way up in the back... this would have provided a stable mounting point for the rear sight. Would have had interesting knock-on changes for the topcover and spring assembly, though.
Just my personal preference, but if I want modularity I'll buy an AR, which I already have.
I would have to try and make one of these as close to the original Galil as I could get it. Again, that pesky purist in me.