necrodude
Active Member
So when I finally have enough money and can get them, the Tavor 21 is gona be banned because it 28.53 inches.
So, I take my 23 year old son to range with me often. This mean he can't use one of my regulated or granfathered guns with me on range?
When he was 12 I taught him how to shoot a 22 rilfe and a 22 revolver. If I ever have grand kids could I or he teach them the same way? Or do I have to let some stranger teach him his version of the basics?
My son in law is in Afghanistan and doesn't return until sometime in October. He likes my M1A competition rifle and I planned to gift it to him when he returns. The way I read the law, I could only will it to him after I am dead. Is that right?
My son in law is in Afghanistan and doesn't return until sometime in October. He likes my M1A competition rifle and I planned to gift it to him when he returns. The way I read the law, I could only will it to him after I am dead. Is that right?
I think so. You could do the transfer to your daughter now. Do transfers between family members require you to go to the police station, or do you just mail them? Maybe you can do it with him out of the Country?
If his current and anticipated residency is in Maryland, yes, I think what you've said is right. If he established residency in some other state, you could "sell or transfer" it to him, accomplishing the transfer through an FFL in his state of residency.
Yeah, when have prosecutors ever used their discretion to buff their political ambitions rather than serve justice?Delegate Dumais, the floor leader in support of the bill, suggested several times that we need not be unduly concerned because of "prosecutorial discretion."
Thank you. My son in law, my daughter and I are all vets.
Can someone confirm. The way I read the bill after oct 1 anyone with a handgun must be subject to fingerprint and pay the fee?
Or should I say if you comply you would have to:
One would expect MSP to choose whichever interpretation most easily enables arrests and convictions.How is the overall length measured for a rifle with a folding stock? This is regarding the "less than 29 inches" test for a banned "copycat." If the overall length is less than 29 inches only when the stock is folded, it seems that a rifle could be banned with the stock folded but not banned with the stock extended.
One would expect MSP to choose whichever interpretation most easily enables arrests and convictions.
I also expect a veritable flood of AK pistols in the state, perhaps sold as AOWs, now that FFLs will be cut off from AK rifles.
I guess all handguns purchased prior to 1986 now need to be registered?