I just introduced a bll to repeal SB281

Knuc · Feb 4, 2015

Thank you for introducing this.

Not_an_outlaw · Feb 4, 2015

Thank you. How can I help.

MDFF2008 · Feb 4, 2015

Can you please explain this part of the bill? "repealing the prohibition on the possession or use of specified firearm ammunition during and in relation to the commission of a crime of violence"

DaemonAssassin · Feb 5, 2015

Thanks for submitting the bill to repeal FSA2013.

balttigger · Feb 5, 2015

Thank you very much Del. Grammer. Like everyone else I am happy to see this. However, I would liked to have seen the part of the law regarding magazine capacity either eliminated or amended so standard capacity 30-round mags would be legal in Maryland again.

Small steps...

thomfantomas · Feb 5, 2015

Thank You it's start,didn't you know you had a account on here

TerminatorSVT · Feb 5, 2015

Thank you Delegate Grammer!

dblas · Feb 5, 2015

Thank you Delegate, I will be in touch soon.

To those that want "more", let's work to reset the clock, and then work from there. Working on the overall repeal of a lot of these laws, in a bill designed to rest the laws to a certain point, only makes the process overly messy and only deletes the argument for resetting the laws and statutes that this bill calls for.

Let's work with the Sponsors to get this bill passed, and then work with them further on additional bills to get the individual parts, laws and regulations, rewritten or even repealed to support the 2A.

Scottysan · Feb 5, 2015

Thank you, for your continuing efforts, they are much appreciated!

Cal68 · Feb 5, 2015

Thank you Delegate Grammer. I dare say that you have the support of just about everyone on MDS.

My only question to you is whether this bill seeks to repeal all of SB281 or only portions of it? I'm not a lawyer, so I could not figure out the answer to this question even after reading the bill!

Thanks for your help.

Cal68

Gryphon · Feb 5, 2015

I too appreciate your efforts Delegate. However, I am curious why you didn't go for broke and eliminate the good and substantial requirement. I don't think doing so would increase or decrease the likelihood the bill would be acted upon favorably by the Democratically dominated anti legislature, so the benefit is keeping the issues up for public discussion and open debate.. Again, your sponsorship is much appreciated.

Jaybeez · Feb 5, 2015

gprimr1 said:
Can you please explain this part of the bill? "repealing the prohibition on the possession or use of specified firearm ammunition during and in relation to the commission of a crime of violence"

sb281 made it illegal to use certain ammo, like ap in a crime. double illegal.

Tomcat · Feb 5, 2015

Thank you, glad to see 2 of the 3 St.Mary's County Reps are co-sponsors. Guess we need to work on the 3rd one Tony O'Donnell and get him on board.

For those of you already nit-picking, all you are reading is the summary in the link. Click on the "Documents" tab then the "Text" it's 45 pages long.

Mooseman · Feb 5, 2015

I wish you the best of luck with this. Thank you.

Kman · Feb 5, 2015

rseymorejr said:
If it passes can I get a refund on my HQL?

But seriously, thank you. We need to hammer back whenever possible.

Yes, but there is a $50 application fee for the refund. This is MD.

Seriously...thank you OP. You are a great American.

TheRussianNightmare · Feb 5, 2015

Good work! It's probably a long shot, but someone has to try. A good start for representing D6.

Also, Eastern Tech Class of '98 :party29:

Ungermc · Feb 5, 2015

Backing your play, thanks for pushing forward!

RRHemi · Feb 5, 2015

Thank you. Any suggestions on how we can effectively support it's passage?

Mr H · Feb 5, 2015

Jaybeez said:
its ok i guess.

how about repealing assault pistols, regulated rifles entirelyn and allow 30 round mags like every other free state.
i get repealing sb281, but even without sb281 we are half f*#ked here in maryland. how about taking a step forward?

These are being addressed in the court at this point

Mr H · Feb 5, 2015

Gryphon said:
I too appreciate your efforts Delegate. However, I am curious why you didn't go for broke and eliminate the good and substantial requirement. I don't think doing so would increase or decrease the likelihood the bill would be acted upon favorably by the Democratically dominated anti legislature, so the benefit is keeping the issues up for public discussion and open debate.. Again, your sponsorship is much appreciated.

There is already a bill submitted for that (SB100?? I'll need to check).

I just introduced a bll to repeal SB281

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Active Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Why should we Free BSD?

Ultimate Member

Crna Ovca

Active Member

Past President, MSI

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

inveniam viam aut faciam

Ultimate Member

Formerly Known As HITWTOM

R.I.P.- Hooligan #4

Blah, blah, blah

Active Member

Uses Gun-oil Aftershave

Active Member

Banana'd

Banana'd

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics