Would love to know the total cost of the program, not just the initial cost. Filing all those incoming cases, storage costs, etc...
We should keep all that "evidence" because it may solve a case someday. However if the gun has been used or abused over the years since the shell casing was taken the chamber markings will change with wear and cleaning so they won't be able to prove a match. Which was one of the big problems with the program to start with.
We should keep all that "evidence" because it may solve a case someday.
Yes, and encourage more lunacy that infringes on the rights of the law abiding, costs millions of dollars and man hours that could be better spent elsewhere. All in the hope that decades later the blind squirrel will finally find a nut and vindicate the idiots that dreamed this crap up.
They'd get more value if they sold the brass for it's scrap value and used the money for something that actually solved crimes.
That was sarcasm.
Holy-fn-Moly, so they knew 4 years into it that NY had spent 4 MILLION DOLLARS and got the same results, zip...
The program was designed to F*** with gun manufacturers. They probably thought some would stop selling in Maryland. The only value a recovered shell casing has any more is dna collection. Stupid liberal bull.Some interesting views of the inventory of shell casings that have never had anything done with them.
I didn't see a post on this sorry if its a duplicate
Click here for the story
After nearly 14 years of absolutely no success with the system, the MSP argued in 2013 that it still had merit, but the very next year in 2014 it said it was "useless"?
Who got fired over that 2013 assessment? Or is that not what really happened?
IIRC, when I was listening to MGA debate it in 2013, there wasn't any support but they refused to kill it anyway.
Just like DNA matching is used to solve decades old crimes, technology hasn't caught up to the point where they could match all of the surrendered shell cases to another 300,000 'collected' from crime scenes.
According to O'Malley's way of thinking, spending even more $M's on it would have been an investment in the future ofgun-control, err ... crime-control, and those evil 2A advocates in the MD legislature wouldn't budget adequate resources to make the program successful. But, translate that kind of logic to any other future firearms technology aimed primarily at gun-control ...
Micro-stamping is spent shell casing on steroids except that it shifts the expense burden to gun manufacturers and buyers with the same outcome ... 100's of 1,000's of 'etched' shell casings with no matches. Why is it that liberal/progressive gun-grabbers double-down on stupid, coming up with even more grandiose schemes that are doomed to even greater failure ? I'd venture a guess that in all but a few cases, follow the money. Someone is more than likely taking government money to promote such lunacy, and/or forcing the private sector to pay for it through regulation.
And don't get me started on smart gun technology ...
Any legalese want to start a class action lawsuit on getting our spent cases back? Legally, I would guess they belong to the owner and we paid for them indirectly.