frosh to appeal Kolbe decision

ohen cepel · Feb 5, 2016

Sorry if this has been posted in one of the other long threads.

He has wasted no time in planning to burn more of our tax dollars to take our rights away:

http://thedailyrecord.com/2016/02/0...-md-gun-law-ruling/?google_editors_picks=true

Can only hope he gets beat again and quickly.

Does Hogan have the ability to stop this maggot?

Inigoes · Feb 5, 2016

Frosh can say anything he wants but it doesn't count, until the AG office files that 1 page piece of paper called "notice of appeal".

ohen cepel · Feb 5, 2016

I just emailed the Governor to encourage him to stop the AG (if he can). Silly for frosh to pi$$ away tax dollars in order to try to take our rights away (again).

Think about dropping the Governor an email coming at it from money angle. He may be able to politically stop frosh even if he doesn't have the power to make him stop.

hodgepodge · Feb 5, 2016

Schipperke · Feb 5, 2016

In the real world, litigation is measured by $$. "The State", aka government is not the real world, they have no skin in the game concerning dollars, they just confiscate what they need. There was never a doubt this would keep going..

Inigoes · Feb 5, 2016

ohen cepel said:
I just emailed the Governor to encourage him to stop the AG (if he can). Silly for frosh to pi$$ away tax dollars in order to try to take our rights away (again).

Think about dropping the Governor an email coming at it from money angle. He may be able to politically stop frosh even if he doesn't have the power to make him stop.

We want Frosh to go the distance. With the state on the losing side, there is a better chance for the SCOTUS to join the fray, and put these AWB and mag limit laws to bed.

good guy 176 · Feb 5, 2016

Frosh looks sick to me. Hopefully, our so called god will end his misery and let us be. He should not be permitted to file an appeal without Hogan's approval. I won't be around to see that turd flushed, but he needs to be put far out to sea.

Lew--Ranger63

teratos · Feb 5, 2016

Of course he will appeal. He believes in this law. He drafted it. Can't wait.

Vile Shadow · Feb 5, 2016

teratos said:
Of course he will appeal. He believes in this law. He drafted it. Can't wait.

Nothin' would make me happier than to see all this blow up in his face. :evilgrin3

Schipperke · Feb 5, 2016

Sling Blade said:
Nothin' would make me happier than to see all this blow up in his face.

I remember all that talk when Gansler appealed Woolard. People that actually want this to keep going in lieu of the state backing down (which is moot regardless) really haven't been in a lot of court rooms, or are gluttons for punishment.

Inigoes · Feb 5, 2016

Schipperke said:
I remember all that talk when Gansler appealed Woolard. People that actually want this to keep going in lieu of the state backing down (which is moot regardless) really haven't been in a lot of court rooms, or are gluttons for punishment.

We prefer the term sadomasochist, thank you very much!

nobis1 · Feb 5, 2016

I can't read the whole article because of the paywall. Is he saying he will request en banc or is he saying he will appeal to SCOTUS? En banc we should know in 2 weeks...

ohen cepel · Feb 5, 2016

Inigoes said:
We want Frosh to go the distance. With the state on the losing side, there is a better chance for the SCOTUS to join the fray, and put these AWB and mag limit laws to bed.

And what if we don't win after he spends millions?

Jaybeez · Feb 5, 2016

maybe he should have read the decision first

Inigoes · Feb 5, 2016

ohen cepel said:
And what if we don't win after he spends millions?

I would rather spend millions of dollars fighting for our freedom, before boolits are shot to restore our freedom.

ohen cepel · Feb 5, 2016

Inigoes said:
I would rather spend millions of dollars fighting for our freedom, before boolits are shot to restore our freedom.

I am not opposed to fighting but am not clear what we gain. Does he simply get beat more at a higher level? What does that get us.

I'm not arguing, I am really not clear what the possible gain is.

gungate · Feb 5, 2016

How long can he delay the process? Years? I would think his primary goal is to negate the recent ruling but if that is looking like it won't happen, his secondary goal would be to delay it for as long as possible. Why, when these laws are negated by the courts, don't they immediately become void and reinstated if/when the ruling is appealed and won?

Inigoes · Feb 5, 2016

ohen cepel said:
I am not opposed to fighting but am not clear what we gain. Does he simply get beat more at a higher level? What does that get us.

I'm not arguing, I am really not clear what the possible gain is.

Getting Strict scrutiny applied, the state will have to prove their argument, instead of only using "it's for the children" or "public safety" defense.

That is a big deal, because the burden of proof has shifted from "The People" to "The State".

ChannelCat · Feb 5, 2016

Inigoes said:
We want Frosh to go the distance. With the state on the losing side, there is a better chance for the SCOTUS to join the fray, and put these AWB and mag limit laws to bed.

Sling Blade said:
Nothin' would make me happier than to see all this blow up in his face.

If Frau Hitlery gets in there, appoints another "wise Latina" :sarcasm:

to the SCOTUS, and this thing drags out long enough, then all this might just blow up in our faces!

ironpony · Feb 5, 2016

What is the possible timeline correlation to his run for Governor?
I may be way off base.

frosh to appeal Kolbe decision

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Ultimate Member

Head'n for the hills

Ultimate Member

Senior Member (Gold)

Ultimate Member

Head'n for the hills

R.I.P.

My hair is amazing

...

Ultimate Member

Head'n for the hills

Active Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Head'n for the hills

Ultimate Member

NRA Patron Member

Head'n for the hills

Ultimate Member

Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics