M1A legality question
- Thread starter Chef Reboulet
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I guess that is where a good lawyer comes in
You don't need a lawyer to establish legal residency in a "free" state, regardless of how much time you might "visit" Maryland.
http://www.tax.virginia.gov/site.cfm?alias=ResidencyStatus#VIRGINIARESIDENTS
Then it becomes a moot point. Own whatever you like and keep it at your "primary" residence in the other state.
- Feb 4, 2013
- 28,175
No, but you have to meet the actual time in state requirements.
MD is similar. So if you stay more than 1/2 the days in MD, you are actually an MD resident. And, if caught, could be subject to back taxes with penalties and interest.
MD is similar. So if you stay more than 1/2 the days in MD, you are actually an MD resident. And, if caught, could be subject to back taxes with penalties and interest.
mike_in_md
Ultimate Member
What is the status of a lawsuit overturning the ban on M1A's?
I know there is the dirty little secret that there are many M1A's made between 1971 and October 1st, 2013 that could easily slip through the cracks because of face to face transfers allowed and sellers and buyers just saying they sold them during a date allowed even though they didn't, but this isn't the way things should be done.
I know there is the dirty little secret that there are many M1A's made between 1971 and October 1st, 2013 that could easily slip through the cracks because of face to face transfers allowed and sellers and buyers just saying they sold them during a date allowed even though they didn't, but this isn't the way things should be done.
Thread is here: http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=148158&highlight=kolbe
Next action is a hearing on the motions scheduled for July 22, in Baltimore.
Maryland residents purchasing a M1A prior to October 1, 2013 would have been required to fill in a MSP 77R form and transfer the rifle through an FFL or MSP Barracks. So there are no dirty little secrets. Please remember that this part of the form is available for public viewing. As per the form rules, "No threads or posts discussing how to violate laws" are allowed.
- Feb 4, 2013
- 28,175
Unless it was purchased a LONG time ago. Somewhere in the 1989 - 1992 range. Prior to that you only filled out the Federal form.
Biggfoot44
Ultimate Member
- Aug 2, 2009
- 33,152
You must be thinking of 1994 for dealer sales , and 1996 for private sales.
- Feb 4, 2013
- 28,175
Could be.
I would have to look at some of my previous posts. But I thought regulated long guns started earlier than 94.
Yeap, 1989 the Form 77 was required for certain long guns. The list was revised in 1994, adding some long guns based on the Federal list.
But the M1A may have not been on the original list, so 1994 for them would be correct.
I would have to look at some of my previous posts. But I thought regulated long guns started earlier than 94.
Yeap, 1989 the Form 77 was required for certain long guns. The list was revised in 1994, adding some long guns based on the Federal list.
But the M1A may have not been on the original list, so 1994 for them would be correct.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
Hair-trigger posting... please include more than just the "headline" (7 Viewers)- Started by Mr H
- Replies: 13
-
-
