So 2 for 11. I am just trying to get my head around the nnumber.
Does aanyone know the numbers before the new memberscame aboard. Close to 0 i would expect.
HPRB August 4, 2015 Meeting Thread
- Thread starter dblas
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
So 2 for 11. I am just trying to get my head around the nnumber.
Does aanyone know the numbers before the new memberscame aboard. Close to 0 i would expect.
On the surface, yes, but like I said there were prohibited applicants and I do not hold the board responsible for denying those. They should have never applied.
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,763
An agenda would be nice. I would like to see argument on removing restrictions and if it hunts.
Just a question , do you think prohibited persons have been applying all along?
To get a true number we must not cherry pic. That would make us as bad as the. antis.
Is there anyway to get the old numbers from before the new members were selected?
We can't even get info about the current board and the meetings.
I don't think throwing out prohibited people is cherry picking. They should have never applied. They can't even own a handgun.
I asked and Ms. Street did not have the agenda as of 11:50am today. I think she is bullsh*ting me. She has to know if she sent notice to those having hearings. I think she is sick of me asking for things. Too bad.
We can't even get info about the current board and the meetings.
I don't think throwing out prohibited people is cherry picking. They should have never applied. They can't even own a handgun.
An assumption would be security guards.
We can't even get info about the current board and the meetings.
I don't think throwing out prohibited people is cherry picking. They should have never applied. They can't even own a handgun.
Yeah its kinda sad that there is no info, old or new, available.
As for cherry picking, skipping any numbers make the whole equation wrong.thats just how that works. The good thing is 2 for 11 is better than 0 for 11.
The bad thing is if the board overturns. 2 per month then there never will be enough permits out there to help us once hogan is gone. Three and a half years times twenty four is only 84 new permits if the numbers keep up at the present pace.
There just isn't the volume of quality applicants.....yet.
Yes there can. I assume you mean G&S, but even with absolutely no standing per the MSP, the board can decide what they wish. They can give a permit to anyone as long as it doesn't violate actual law, not the interpretation of the law.
You can apply with self-defense and they can issue a permit, which the SP would never do.
Yes g and s.
How many with self defense have been overturned by the board? I understand your meaning but didnt the msp just put out that telling the board to use s and s?
Dont get me wrong, i want things to change, i just dont see much if any real movement just yet.
- Apr 26, 2012
- 5,290
G&S= good and substantial
S&S= Snowden and Scherr
S&S= Snowden and Scherr
Yes, i would have spelled them out if i was not on this phone.
That has been on their website for about a year and they push those cases whenever they can. The board has not formally been made aware. If it has not been addressed by the time my case is reviewed, then I will make sure they know about it.
Yes, but, some of those do not understand that they are prohibited (i.e. 25 year old with a juvenile conviction, is prohibited until age 30, etc.)
On this, we all agree, so there would be several sets of numbers, one that is total applications for appeal, total denials upheld because of being prohibited, total denials upheld because ??, and total number of reversals.
Probably not, and even if we could, probably no way to break them down like above.
Wait a second those details can't be right for July...
July 7th was "no meeting was held".
July21st, there was only 4 reviews and 2 hearings according to my notes.
Thank you for the clarification.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
-
-
Tennessee legislature passes bill to arm teachers; leftist lose their minds (1 Viewer)
- Latest: BurkeM
-
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tennessee legislature passes bill to arm teachers; leftist lose their minds (1 Viewer)- Started by jc1240
- Replies: 42