AR-15 SBR n00b questions

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,217
    Yes , that is "Manufacturing" . No , it is not yet clear Md's intentions as regards various NFA items involving actions potentially related to firearms that would be banned in semi-auto Rifle configuration.

    To be greatest degree of CYA in this situation , hand the lower/ donor firearm to your friendly neighborhood 007/SOT . In that case the "Manufacturing Date" is when they submit the (Form 2 ? ) . When the item subsequently come to you on a Form 4 , it is a Transfer , not permission to Manf . The Engraving will then be "Billy Bob's Machine Guns & Frisbies Inc " rather than " Your Name, Your Town".
     

    Kingjamez

    Gun Builder
    Oct 22, 2009
    2,042
    Fairfax, VA
    Yes , that is "Manufacturing"

    Turning an existing firearm into a NFA firearm is NOT manufacturing, it's making.

    As said above, the definition of make can include manufacturing, but doesn't have to. It's kind of like all squares are parallelograms, but not all parallelograms are squares.

    -Jim
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,217
    Opps , simultanious typing.

    But still much the same points. You are "creating" a firearm. We still have no idea how MSP will wish to regulate such topics . MSP probably has no idea yet how they will aproach such topics. Nobody has any idea if MSP's desires would conflict with Federal regulations.

    It remains the most ( cautous , conservitive , self protecting ) to have an SOT run your parts thru their book to establish an unequivocable pre Oct "Born On Date" , and then transfer to you on Form 4 , than for you to have a potential Md Regulation issue pop up while you are waiting on your Form 1 to be approved.
     

    USAFRavenR6

    Active Member
    Apr 7, 2012
    734
    Mur-land
    You should read what that form 1 is: permission to manufacture. You are manufacturing. It really is that simple, and playing this semantics game isn't going to impress the ATF or the MSP.

    Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using Tapatalk HD

    Your time of the month? Its assembling and regardless, I have the upper and lower and guess what, once I get the stamp (pre or post Oct 1) I am going to "assemble them". Again, no where on form 1 does it say that you are manufacturing a firearm, it says "making". It wants to know the original manufacturer of the lower as well as defining in section i, " If an existing firearm is being modified into an NFA firearm, enter the existing serial number of the firearm into item 4g and the name and address of the original manufacturer into item 4a." Again, manufacturer is defined in section b as, "Registration by Qualified Manufacturer. A person who has a Federal firearms license to manufacture firearms (Type 07 or 10) and who has paid special (occupational) tax to manufacture NFA firearms is exempt from the making tax and filing of the ATF Form 1 application. Such qualified manufacturer must report and register each NFA firearm manufactured by filing ATF Form 2, Notice of Firearms Manufactured or Imported, as required by 27 CFR § 479.102." Meaning that I, who is not someone who possesses a Federal firearms license to manufacture a firearm fills out form 1 opposed to form 2, as all manufacturers fill out. Thanks for your worthless input though
     

    USAFRavenR6

    Active Member
    Apr 7, 2012
    734
    Mur-land
    Opps , simultanious typing.

    But still much the same points. You are "creating" a firearm. We still have no idea how MSP will wish to regulate such topics . MSP probably has no idea yet how they will aproach such topics. Nobody has any idea if MSP's desires would conflict with Federal regulations.

    It remains the most ( cautous , conservitive , self protecting ) to have an SOT run your parts thru their book to establish an unequivocable pre Oct "Born On Date" , and then transfer to you on Form 4 , than for you to have a potential Md Regulation issue pop up while you are waiting on your Form 1 to be approved.

    The MSP have nothing to do with my form 1 being approved or will they be notified. This is between myself and the feds. I already possess all components to assemble and am merely waiting on the stamp. its not like a magical fairy is going to tip off the MSP that I built a SBR post Oct 1. please, they cant even clear a background check in 100 days, what makes you think they have any insight into what people are assembling?
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    Make. The term “make”, and the various derivatives of such word, shall include manufacturing (other than by one qualified to engage in such business under the NFA) , putting together, altering, any combination of these, or otherwise producing a fiream.
    All I can say is this: I wouldn't want to be in front of a Maryland judge trying to argue that I was "making" and not "manufacturing" a firearm after 10/1. Does Maryland law define manufacturing such that making doesn't fall under it? And the difference is semi-irrelevant anyways, given that there's also a ban on possession post-10/1. Whether you "make" or "manufacture" it into existence after that is basically irrelevant.

    Why this matters if you're using a trust is simple: the MSP can get your NFA form real easy from the NFA branch if they ever come after you. And if that form is post-10/1, they've now potentially got something to hang over your head.
     

    IMBLITZVT

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 20, 2009
    3,799
    Catonsville, MD
    Boy, this sure has turned into an argument over pretty small details.

    Simple fact is that in MD post Oct 1, it will not matter if you take a Registered gun and SBR it. SBRs are not banned under the new law. The real question comes if you want to take an SBR and turn it back into a rifle... now that might not be allowed.
     

    USAFRavenR6

    Active Member
    Apr 7, 2012
    734
    Mur-land
    All I can say is this: I wouldn't want to be in front of a Maryland judge trying to argue that I was "making" and not "manufacturing" a firearm after 10/1. Does Maryland law define manufacturing such that making doesn't fall under it? And the difference is semi-irrelevant anyways, given that there's also a ban on possession post-10/1. Whether you "make" or "manufacture" it into existence after that is basically irrelevant.

    Why this matters if you're using a trust is simple: the MSP can get your NFA form real easy from the NFA branch if they ever come after you. And if that form is post-10/1, they've now potentially got something to hang over your head.

    What is banned from possession? I dont think you fully understand what 281 is. I already possess the stripped lower, its mine in my safe. Form one is registering that lower as a SBR and paying a tax. I have already posted what form 1 reads for instructions and it is clear, I am not manufacturing anything. I feel like I am at the nerd table at lunch in high school arguing over magic the gathering cards............
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    I'm not arguing with someone who apparently needs to punctuate all of his arguments with personal attacks, never mind accusing the guy who wrote the SB281 FAQ of not knowing what's in SB281. Believe whatever you want.
     

    USAFRavenR6

    Active Member
    Apr 7, 2012
    734
    Mur-land
    I'm not arguing with someone who apparently needs to punctuate all of his arguments with personal attacks, never mind accusing the guy who wrote the SB281 FAQ of not knowing what's in SB281. Believe whatever you want.

    I didn't attack you, I said I felt like I was in an argument with someone playing magic the gathering. If you are referring to the time of the month comment im sorry, I was drinking last night when i posted it up.

    So you wrote the FAQ, how do you know they are accurate and you are not informing the people of this board? I'm not saying you are but I think there are alot of unknowns out there and cant take a FAQ as gospel at this point.
     

    Kingjamez

    Gun Builder
    Oct 22, 2009
    2,042
    Fairfax, VA
    a suppressor is not a weapon, its an item.;)
    Definition of Firearm when dealing with NFA law:

    c. Firearm. The term “firearm” means: (1) a shotgun having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length; (2) a weapon made from a shotgun if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length; (3) a rifle having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length; (4) a weapon made from a rifle if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length; (5) any other weapon as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 5845(e); (6) a machinegun; (7) a muffler or silencer for any firearm whether or not such firearm is included within this definition; and (8) a destructive device.

    -Jim
     

    ews25

    Member
    Apr 21, 2013
    68
    People's Republic of PG
    So I'm an SBR noob too. I want to get one lined up before 10/1. If I start with a stripped lower, what is the process? A complete lower? What if I want to just buy one off the shelf through a local dealer or gunbroker?
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,485
    Westminster USA
    IIRC if you have the components to make an SBR, you have in fact "made" the weapon. I would store the upper some where else until your tax stamp comes back from BATFE.
     

    BradMacc82

    Ultimate Member
    Industry Partner
    Aug 17, 2011
    26,177
    IIRC if you have the components to make an SBR, you have in fact "made" the weapon. I would store the upper some where else until your tax stamp comes back from BATFE.

    Constructive Possession, IIRC.

    I have my 12.2" upper stored in a safe at another location until my stamp comes in. Just to play it safe.
     

    JPG

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 5, 2012
    7,051
    Calvert County
    IIRC if you have the components to make an SBR, you have in fact "made" the weapon. I would store the upper some where else until your tax stamp comes back from BATFE.

    I am getting ready to build my first SBR and this is confusing me. :o

    How do I know what the OVERALL length will be if I can't have the parts until I get the stamp?

    I am building a 300 with a barral length of 10 - 10.5, haven't decided yet (depending on manufacture) - will be suppressed.
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,485
    Westminster USA
    I can't give you good legal advice on that. sorry. You could measure them separately from a reference mark on one of them I suppose.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,538
    Messages
    7,285,544
    Members
    33,475
    Latest member
    LikeThatHendrix

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom