How serious is Pritzker??

Doctor_M · Jul 8, 2014

Does anyone know if Jeffrey Pritzker is serious about this race?? I'm willing to support him (anything to defeat Frosh), but I'm not real impressed with what I've seen so far.

My questions to his campaign go unanswered. His website isn't impressive or designed to get support/donations. I can't find anyone that has signs, stickers, or anything advertising his name. Good grief. Feels like we are giving up without a fight. I've got a big field that I would let him put a large sign in... if only I could get in touch with someone.

:sad20:

Mr H · Jul 8, 2014

I've noticed the same thing.

Boondock Saint · Jul 8, 2014

The AG's race was decided a few weeks ago. Doesn't matter how much money the Republican spends. Short of Frosh getting caught with in bed with a farm animal (and honestly even then I truly believe he could still be elected in this state), he's our new AG.

:puke2:

Mr H · Jul 8, 2014

This is why people begged Peroutka to run for AG.

Half-cocked · Jul 8, 2014

Boondock Saint said:
The AG's race was decided a few weeks ago. Doesn't matter how much money the Republican spends. Short of Frosh getting caught with in bed with a farm animal (and honestly even then I truly believe he could still be elected in this state), he's our new AG.

Are you kidding? For liberals, this would be a resume enhancement. Zoophiles are the latest "misunderstood and oppressed victims of prejudice" to be welcomed into the left-wing "rainbow coalition".

Jim12 · Jul 8, 2014

Boondock Saint said:
The AG's race was decided a few weeks ago. Doesn't matter how much money the Republican spends. Short of Frosh getting caught with in bed with a farm animal (and honestly even then I truly believe he could still be elected in this state), he's our new AG.

Wait a minute. Didn't they just legalize marrying farm animals in Maryland? Or was it just the domesticated ones?

If the Republican candidate wanted to run a race, he would have done something -- anything -- to get some attention by now. Nobody even knows who he is. Or that he's running.

MDFF2008 · Jul 8, 2014

It's really pathetic with how much crap Frosh has, this guy can't do shit.

Brooklyn · Jul 8, 2014

If you have limited funds you do not spend them now. No one is paying attention.
That said Frosh is likely to win. We are going to be in court a lot over the next term.

abean4187 · Jul 8, 2014

No amount of money will make Frosh lose this race. It’s been a done deal since the primary.

Mr H · Jul 8, 2014

abean4187 said:
No amount of money will make Frosh lose this race. It’s been a done deal since the primary.

While that may well be the case, damaging his reputation with the public can't hurt.

danb · Jul 8, 2014

abean4187 said:
No amount of money will make Frosh lose this race. It’s been a done deal since the primary.

Maybe, but you can't win if you don't play the game.

IMO its really early yet. Nobody pays attention to much until Sept.

Mr H · Jul 8, 2014

danb said:
Maybe, but you can't win if you don't play the game.

IMO its really early yet. Nobody pays attention to much until Sept.

But the dirty little secret? If folks aren't active at the low levels between now and Labor Day, there will be nothing to draw on at that point.

The fact that Pritzker (and some others that will go unnamed at this point) are not communicating with potential supporters is concerning.

Brooklyn · Jul 8, 2014

Mr H said:
While that may well be the case, damaging his reputation with the public can't hurt.

Yes it can. The public will not react the way we will.

Run on gun issues alone and you will lose. No too negative to early it may blow back....

I hope they are doing a lot of statigic thinking right now..

Mr H · Jul 8, 2014

Brooklyn said:
Yes it can. The public will not react the way we will.

Run on gun issues alone and you will lose. No too negative to early it may blow back....

I hope they are doing a lot of statigic thinking right now..

Where did I say "gun issues alone"? There is a lot more than that to use. I'd have thought you knew me better than that by now. I find being a single-issue voter to be of limited use.

If he is going to be AG, I want him to be untrusted by more than just usses.

MDFF2008 · Jul 8, 2014

I would expose him for his votes on violent crime and pedophilia.

Jim12 · Jul 8, 2014

Shouldn't an AG have some prosecutorial, or at least criminal law experience?

Jim12 · Jul 8, 2014

It's summer, and people from the entire DC area flock to the MD and DE beaches. There's almost no better way to get some name recognition and make a quick point than to rent billboard space on Rt. 50 on the Eastern Shore.

abean4187 · Jul 8, 2014

Brooklyn said:
Yes it can. The public will not react the way we will.

Run on gun issues alone and you will lose. No too negative to early it may blow back....

I hope they are doing a lot of statigic thinking right now..

This right here. Supporting gun control in MD is an absolute way win in a statewide election. If someone is going to be pro gun in this state they are going to have to be really good on other issues that liberals care about cause gun rights alone results in a big loss.

abean4187 · Jul 8, 2014

Jim12 said:
Shouldn't an AG have some prosecutorial, or at least criminal law experience?

Well, SB281 is a crime against the constitution so Frosh has plenty of experience in terms of criminal laws.

Doctor_M · Jul 8, 2014

gprimr1 said:
I would expose him for his votes on violent crime and pedophilia.

THIS!!

How serious is Pritzker??

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Certified Mad Scientist

Banana'd

Ultimate Member

Banana'd

Senior Meatbag

Let Freedom Ring

Ultimate Member

I stand with John Locke.

Ultimate Member

Banana'd

dont be a dumbass

Banana'd

I stand with John Locke.

Banana'd

Ultimate Member

Let Freedom Ring

Let Freedom Ring

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Certified Mad Scientist

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics