Lower case democracy
Military Spouse must have HQL in MD
- Thread starter drblast33
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Lower case democracy
20+ years active duty. All in strategic communications field. Never fired a hand gun in an official capacity although I did carry a .45 on payday guard duty as Sgt of the Guard once.
As most have stated, no one should have to pay this TAX, which is all it is, to exercise a God given right. The .gov had nothing to do with my right to protect my family or myself or for that matter, for any legal purpose I choose as a reason to purchase/own/carry.
As most have stated, no one should have to pay this TAX, which is all it is, to exercise a God given right. The .gov had nothing to do with my right to protect my family or myself or for that matter, for any legal purpose I choose as a reason to purchase/own/carry.
That's not the issue in this thread ... the issue is should your exemption be extended to family members. You carried the .45 ... did you receive handgun training prior to being issued the weapon?
So Dr.Blast,
Have you recovered from being slapped around and kick all over for daring to ask a question and sharing an opinion?
By the way, Which one did you fall under in your listed category for exemption?
Spouse?
Child?
drblast33
[This Space for Sale ...]
Actually I was the seller. I had to wait for the military member to come back stateside, and he purchased the firearm. While working the sale I misread the new HQL law. I thought military and dependants were exempt from the HQL. Comes to find out that dependents are only exempt from the MD residency requirement of the MD HQL.
Sent from my SAMSUNG Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my SAMSUNG Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro
habanerchaser
Member
As an E1 I made $313 every two weeks and deployed 270 days out of 365 one year.
If my guns stay back home with my wife, why should she have we have to spend ~$300 for the HQL set up when we are only going to be here 2 to 3 years?
This is the typical set up. Most spouses are female with kid(s) without relatives in the area. The real question should be why does anyone need the HQL...
If my guns stay back home with my wife, why should she have we have to spend ~$300 for the HQL set up when we are only going to be here 2 to 3 years?
This is the typical set up. Most spouses are female with kid(s) without relatives in the area. The real question should be why does anyone need the HQL...
Because OMouthy is an *******?
Your question has been asked and debated 10,000 times. Preachin to the choir.
Why didn't you just put them away and STFU while you were deployed?
Besides, seabags were only one size.
- Feb 4, 2013
- 28,175
Your wife does not need an HQL to have your handguns while you deploy, any more than she would need one to have access to them when you are at work during the day.
HQL is for PURCHASE or PERMANENT transfer of ownership. Unless you are gifting or selling them to her, no HQL needed.
HQL is for PURCHASE or PERMANENT transfer of ownership. Unless you are gifting or selling them to her, no HQL needed.
The d becomes smaller all the time
No disrespect, but you now know what it's like when I have a person walk out of the shop when they discover what they need to do to make a handgun purchase.
Lou45, I was at Kerr Brothers in Cumberland on Black Friday, while in town visiting my parents for the holidays. An older fella, probably 80, wanted to purchase a handgun. They had to turn him away after explaining the process. It made me ill and angry, that a person who lives in a city, which in my opinion is going to the dogs due to poverty can't get something to protect himself. I knew all along this was ridiculous, but when I witnessed it with my own eyes, it all kind of hit home. Where is an 80 year old going to come up with the time or money to go through MOM's asinine processes.
FlatsFlite
Active Member
Things change. The Military Spouse Residency Relief Act was singed into law in 2009. Now the spouse can "keep" his or her home of record as long as they are in the state for the sole reason of being with their service member. Each state has minor tweaks, but that's the gist of it on a federal level.
