21st Gun bill day part deux the senate menace

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

Norton said:
Maybe because they're busy running their businesses?

It does beg to ask, though, was the representative of the dealers' association testifying?

Dealers pay dues to those people and I can't see that they do anything in return.

Nope.

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

PG SA testifying now. She's talking but not saying anything. Imagine that.

All of the attorneys in this room have to be salivating in anticipating of those without law degrees testifying in opposition to this bill.

EL1227 · Feb 23, 2012

Originally Posted by Boondock Saint
Raskin asking a loaded question about "if we started from scratch, would you support any record keeping whatsoever?"

Norton said:
They already have it........

My God....they already have it!

That's like asking the question "When did you stop beating your wife?"

hvymax · Feb 23, 2012

Norton said:
They already have it........

My God....they already have it!

He did pull it back somewhat but I hope I made the point that there is nothing preventing the police from investigating crime.

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

This is ridiculous. Someone (Mont SA?) is saying that a convicted felon can be in possession of a rifle or shotgun.

Felons...are...prohibited...persons...

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

Det. Bill Ryan of BCoPD testifying, the guy that took Valley Guns' license. At least that's how he phrased it.

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

Here comes Ben in opposition.

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

Forehand asks "how will MD know if they had committed a crime in another state?"

Ben answered it well. Now one of the western MD folks speaking.

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

JJ coming up now. Making excellent points.

Mr H · Feb 23, 2012

Boondock Saint said:
Forehand asks "how will MD know if they had committed a crime in another state?"

Ben answered it well. Now one of the western MD folks speaking.

I can't listen in, but a question...

Are these people naturually obtuse, or just being willful and dutiful idiotlogues???

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

Frosh says "you're here to defend the right of violent felons to own firearms"

..............................

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

"Violent felons who have been convicted of violent felonies know they've been convicted of violent felonies, right?"

Frosh is a ****ing *******, not to put too fine a point on it.

Raskin's trying to make some point about federalism...this guy is a hot mess.

Shank pointing out that criminals don't follow the law anyway and this bill will solve nothing.

Jacobs largely echoing.

Ramirez trying to make a point through shall issue, somehow. I haven't the foggiest idea where the hell he's going with this. He's off the reservation at this point. "Apples and oranges" as JJ says.

EL1227 · Feb 23, 2012

Do you think that once the word gets out that we're represented by persons like Sen. Frosh they will never want to move here, and others are likely to move away citing his narrow minded, single focus on destroying gun rights.

EL1227 · Feb 23, 2012

Ding, ding, ding, ding ...

mr h said:
I can't listen in, but a question...

Are these people naturually obtuse, or just being willful and dutiful idiotlogues???

We have a winner ...

PresentArms · Feb 23, 2012

Cant get a working Link

EL1227 · Feb 23, 2012

"Are they required to notify authorities or are they on a registry ?"

Who asked that STUPID question ?

Kashmir1008 · Feb 23, 2012

People who have been convicted of of a "violent" crime in another state where it could be just a misdemeanor would be "disallowed" in Maryland. They would be instantly become criminals for a misdemeanor crime under this bill

Even here in Maryland - I have a friend who was convicted of a misdemeanor 20 years ago when he was 18 - he threw a roll-a-dex at someone and the crime carried a potential sentence of 1 year in jail (he got no time) But it was considered a "violent" crime so he is not allowed to own a regulated weapon in MD

Boondock Saint · Feb 23, 2012

Is anyone else listening? Ramirez practically sounds high, or at least profoundly simpleminded.

Mr H · Feb 23, 2012

Boondock Saint said:
"Violent felons who have been convicted of violent felonies know they've been convicted of violent felonies, right?"

Sure... and they also know they're CARRYING ILLEGALLY...

Somehow, they seem smarter than Frosh.

Kashmir1008 · Feb 23, 2012

who is speaking right now? He can't understand the difference between concealed carry and bringing your personal property in to the State as part of a visit or move? Where do they find these retards?

21st Gun bill day part deux the senate menace

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

R.I.P.

Banned

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Banana'd

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

R.I.P.

R.I.P.

Ultimate Member

R.I.P.

MSI Executive Member

Ultimate Member

Banana'd

MSI Executive Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics