2nd Amendment Attorney Wanted

Holy hell... This sounds like some really messed up stuff.

The federal court's decision is public. Why not share the decision? I will search Pacer today - I will surely be able to find it.

The decision was issued in April, but this post was made yesterday, the LiveLeak post was done 3 days ago, and the same post was made anonymously yesterday to Copblock.org. I am skeptical ...

AntiGun said:

related?
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b17_1436635860

Click to expand...

Damn.

Dont hold your breath to see anoyone prosecuted or reprimanded from this,i seen first hand a few years ago locally what happened when word of a druged out informant was used for a multi dept raid where aleged firearms and other firearm related stuff was not there tben later state just quietly drops it

Abulg1972 said:

The federal court's decision is public. Why not share the decision?

I am skeptical ...

Click to expand...

My thoughts exactly.

Interesting...I'd like to see why this whole thing unfolded in the first place.

SRD said:

Damn.

Click to expand...

Damn squared.. Why they would not show warrant? Cause they had none?

We can only hope this is against Frosh. I would love to see him dis-bared.

Schipperke said:

Damn squared.. Why they would not show warrant? Cause they had none?

Click to expand...

But they had hoodies that said SHERIFF on them. No warrants needed.

People surely do get "railroaded" by the system....but I have my doubts here. When the tin foil appears too tight...it generally is.

On 30 November 2012, the Harford County Sheriff’s
Department, along with federal law enforcement agencies (ATF, FBI, DHS, et al),
illegally raided a privately owned home in Bel Air, MD. In violation of state and federal law, a government
gun-grabbing group seized a private collection of firearms that the lead
gun-grabber, Penman, described under oath as an “obscenely large”
collection.

To bolster their case, the government gun-grabbers knowingly and
intentionally falsified charges and fabricated evidence against whom they
believed owned the guns. After four days of torture in the Harford County
Detention Center and charged with about 150 years of prison time for countless
false non-violent felonies by Wyzga, the accused was released on the highest
bail in Harford County Maryland history despite never having been convicted of
a previous crime, having served his country honorably for over 30 years, and
being 100% disabled. In fact, the
accused was released on bail despite every unethical attempt possible by the
law breakers to prevent his release.



Unfortunately, 98.6% of all Americans that are rightly
or wrongly charged with one or more crimes in America during the past few
decades accept a plea deal and admit guilt to crimes even when many are
innocent of the crime. American county,
state, and federal government gun-grabbing law breakers know this fact and are
confident any they accuse today will do the same and thereby prevent all of them
from being exposed as lawless government thugs.
More importantly, even when these government gun-grabbing lawbreakers
fail in their lawless attempts they know all too well that they will not be held
accountable for their actions because they are legally immune from prosecution
under American law.

Fortunately, the accused failed to follow the norm
established by the previous American herd and refused to accept a plea
deal. Consequently, the government gun-grabbing
law-breakers increased their lawless activities against the accused to
demonstrate their unaccountable power in an effort to coerce the accused into
accepting a plea deal.

The two innocent victims being unlawfully arrested on
10 January 2014 are the son and wife of the accused. They were identified during Discovery to
Assistant State’s Attorney H. Scott Lewis as key defense witnesses. It is important to note that Lewis attempted
to coerce the accused on more than one occasion into accepting a plea deal by
stating that he would charge his wife and son with false charges if the accused
did not accept a plea deal. The two
innocent victims were indicted and charged for alleged crimes over a year after
they were supposed to have committed the crime.
Their arrest came three days before the accused’s Suppression Hearing to
determine if 4th Amendment Right was violated and was scheduled to
begin on Monday, 13 January 2014. They
were intentionally arrested on a Friday in the hope that the accused would not
be able to raise the bail money in time for two of his key witnesses to testify
on his behalf at his Monday hearing.



The video you are about to watch is the arrest of the
accused’s wife and son. It is one of the
most disgusting displays of police abuse one can see in America. Two cowardly male individuals that never
identify themselves unlawfully enter a private home without warrants and brandish
a gun after knowing that the occupants were previously disarmed by government
gun-grabbing lawbreakers.

On 13 April 2015, the situation was finally resolved
when a Judge ruled that the government gun-grabbers violated the accused’s 4th
Amendment Rights. All charges against
all of the defendants were later dismissed.
The government gun-grabbing lawbreakers remain unpunished to this date.

The sad fact is that as of this writing no Maryland attorney
is willing to sue the government gun-grabbing lawbreakers simply because, “there
is not enough money to be made in suing them”!
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b17_1436635860#f9QgvvvC3Yuq2PEV.99

Anyone find out WHY the ATF and Sheriff showed up at the residence? Let's hear the whole story...

(never mind, found it on Maryland case search -video and the narrative posted gives all the clues you'll need to find it, I'll leave it at that)

Good luck your gonna need it...

There is a video of sheriffs deputies there to arrest the mom. Don't know if real or not.

In my admittedly lame searching, I haven't found the court decision nor anything about either the man's arrest nor the mother&son arrest.

IF what OP states and what's on LiveFreak is 100% truth, I'd think there'd be lawyers crawling out of the woodwork to handle the case.

As we've been reminded on this site many times, there's three sides to the story.

A case number would go a long way in discussion of the details.

Edit: Thanks to GlockMafia for the search tips...

Edit2: Good luck - the arrest of mom&son sure does have very suspicious timing - all to have charges nolle'd...

whistlersmother said:

IF what OP states and what's on LiveFreak is 100% truth, I'd think there'd be lawyers crawling out of the woodwork to handle the case.

Click to expand...

That's the truth. There are a lot of really hungry lawyers out there and you can almost find a lawyer to take just about any case. Problem is he wants the lawyer to finance his litigation, so any decent business person is going to weigh the costs of the case versus probability and amount of any recovery. The fact that he can't find any lawyer is a big warning flag IMO.

CharlieFoxtrot said:

That's the truth. There are a lot of really hungry lawyers out there and you can almost find a lawyer to take just about any case. Problem is he wants the lawyer to finance his litigation, so any decent business person is going to weigh the costs of the case versus probability and amount of any recovery. The fact that he can't find any lawyer is a big warning flag IMO.

Click to expand...

An unpleasant question that arises is whether he can't find a lawyer because the case is unsound, or because there's no hope of prevailing against the MD legal old boy network.

From my very limited exposure to the courts in MD, the outcomes turn on luck, rather than their adherence to the highest legal principles.

No personal offense intended, you understand.

You should talk to some of the legal industry partners here, OP.

GlockMafia said:

Anyone find out WHY the ATF and Sheriff showed up at the residence? Let's hear the whole story...

(never mind, found it on Maryland case search -video and the narrative posted gives all the clues you'll need to find it, I'll leave it at that)

Good luck your gonna need it...

Click to expand...

Why be so cryptic? Let us know what you found or point to a link in the Maryland Case Search.
Only thing that I can come close with is T.E. Maloney.
Thnx

Schipperke said:

Damn squared.. Why they would not show warrant? Cause they had none?

Click to expand...

snallygaster said:

But they had hoodies that said SHERIFF on them. No warrants needed.

Click to expand...

You're right...they didn't have a "search warrant" because they didn't have one!! Those 2 deputies are part of a "warrant unit" and didn't have a search warrant because they were not there search the premise. they have an "arrest warrant" to arrest the guy in the penguin t-shirt!!

they don't have to produce an arrest warrant HOWEVER if it was a search warrant they would have to produce it. I would like to read the warrant and also read the Judges decision on the dismissal of charges. The OP states there was a violation of the 4th Amendment....that's quite possible but I would like the read the SOC and decision from the suppression hearing. Why was the warrant unit there, what did the warrant say and what probable cause where there in the first place. If you see the video....no guns were seized or even discussed.

In this country...anyone can sue anyone but it doesn't make that person right or not-guilty. For God's sake we can thank Johnny Cochran for that!!! I know all those in the video and all those mentioned by the OP.....I'm sure there's much more then meets the eye.

BTW....the female was cuffed because she was obviously hindering. Several times she put herself and her arms in front of the stairway. The video shows that, handcuffing doesn't mean there is an arrest but is a good way to prevent the incident from further getting out of control or physical.

I'm not going to say that police officers don't make bad arrests because we have youtube to show that that's not true. What I'm saying is get the whole story before you pass judgement either on the deputies there or the boy in the penguin shirt.

GlockMafia said:

Anyone find out WHY the ATF and Sheriff showed up at the residence? Let's hear the whole story...

Click to expand...

that my friend it the $1 MILLION Question.

All we see is angry man in penguin shirt fighting with 2 deputies who should show ID. Did he really care, one had a badge around his neck, the other (redhead) had his in his pocket.

fivepointstar said:

You're right...they didn't have a "search warrant" because they didn't have one!! Those 2 deputies are part of a "warrant unit" and didn't have a search warrant because they were not there search the premise. they have an "arrest warrant" to arrest the guy in the penguin t-shirt!!

they don't have to produce an arrest warrant HOWEVER if it was a search warrant they would have to produce it. I would like to read the warrant and also read the Judges decision on the dismissal of charges. The OP states there was a violation of the 4th Amendment....that's quite possible but I would like the read the SOC and decision from the suppression hearing. Why was the warrant unit there, what did the warrant say and what probable cause where there in the first place. If you see the video....no guns were seized or even discussed.

In this country...anyone can sue anyone but it doesn't make that person right or not-guilty. For God's sake we can thank Johnny Cochran for that!!! I know all those in the video and all those mentioned by the OP.....I'm sure there's much more then meets the eye.

BTW....the female was cuffed because she was obviously hindering. Several times she put herself and her arms in front of the stairway. The video shows that, handcuffing doesn't mean there is an arrest but is a good way to prevent the incident from further getting out of control or physical.

I'm not going to say that police officers don't make bad arrests because we have youtube to show that that's not true. What I'm saying is get the whole story before you pass judgement either on the deputies there or the boy in the penguin shirt.

Click to expand...