ken792
Ultimate Member
Haha, I've been quoted!
I don't think so. We should tar and feather the lawmakers who mandate they be the only thing available. The technology itself is completely benign.
1 - Some people need to park their high horses. The gun rights community has no greater friend than Andy. That's a fact.
2 - I might buy one as a collector's item, because this thing is going the way of the gyro-jet.
3 - There is nothing inherently wrong with the idea of a smart gun. The technology just isn't ripe yet.
And honestly, this gun only has one purpose, and that is to show legislators that smart guns are here, and it's time to start mandating them.
3 - There is nothing inherently wrong with the idea of a smart gun. The technology just isn't ripe yet.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion of what engage is doing, just make sure you have thought it all through – after all – it’s for our children
If NJ says this gun is what starts the 3 year clock, what about other calibers? If in 3 years there is still only a .22LR, will 9mm, .45, etc all still be banned or would it be per caliber?
Ryan you need to reread the law.. it doesn't have to be sold it's the opinion of the AG is they are available and even though the store in California didn't sell any they had them there for sale and that's all the needs to happen for the AG to enact this law
Ryan the fact is the gun does not have to be sold the AG just needs to think it can be sold The key word Is deemed ... it doesn't say it has to be sold. Even if oak tree didn't sell one they considered it (deemed) and if the AG is an anti gun person this is all he needed to start the law.. The gun does not have to sell
The only positive I see, of course it will be a negative for NJ, is that we get a court challenge.
Heller said guns in common use are allowed, so unless a majority of other states adopt smart guns in every caliber, NJ won't have a legal leg to stand on.
Drake will be decided by then, in our favor god willing, which will but even more legal pressure on NJ.