Mike4Maryland
Harford County, MD USA
- Apr 5, 2013
- 478
I saw this in American Rifleman in the January Issue and thought it would be a nice bookmark:
http://obamaslastday012017.com/
http://obamaslastday012017.com/
I saw this in American Rifleman in the January Issue and thought it would be a nice bookmark:
http://obamaslastday012017.com/
Unless he makes up a third term.
Lolololol...... What a minute....... BoooooooooooooooooooooUnless he makes up a third term.
Obama is just going to spend the next couple years trying to do as much damage institutionally to the US as possible
Obama is just going to spend the next couple years trying to do as much damage institutionally to the US as possible
Winner Winner-Chicken Dinner.
To date, no one has successfully explained what mechanism is in place to unseat a sitting president.
Amendment22 said:Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice
Supreme Court.
Not unless he appoints himself, and gets the senate to agree before the new majority takes over.
Maybe he can get Ginsberg to resign, and make a recess appointment. No reason he can't hold both offices simultaneously; after all, he's a Constitutional scholar. And he knows what Executive Orders are all about.
But it's more likely he'll declare martial law, and suspend elections for the duration. If he backdates the proclamation, he can keep the new Senate from seating; his current majority will grant him that, in return for becoming senators-for-life.
A third election would be in violation of the 22nd Amendment to the US Constitution:
If he stood for election, he couldn't legally appear on any ballot. If he did, he couldn't legally be elected. If a majority of electors voted for him, their votes would be invalid. If he attempted to take office, that would be an attempted coup.
The mechanism that is in place to unseat a sitting president is that the next president tells the US Secret Service to pick him up and throw him out onto the front lawn.
Code:
He could run as the vice president on the Democratic ballot and it would be constitutional.
I'm just saying...
Jim Smith