Century Arms C308 BANNED in MD???

Bolts Rock · Jul 20, 2015

Jimbob2.0 said:
They had a busy month in July, they banned the ARX100 too.

Just butt hurt there.

lilgibby · Jul 21, 2015

You have to be ****in kidding me.

Combloc · Jul 21, 2015

The way I see it, a person has two options

1. If you want it, buy it as soon as it hits the market. You snooze, you looze.

2. Follow these words from the Declaration of Independence:
"...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government...,"

The choice is yours and both can be made to work depending on the circumstances.

There are other options but posting them would probably be a bad idea.

Boom Boom · Jul 21, 2015

Jimbob2.0 said:
Did you notice the term "cosmetic" comes up more and more in their rulings?

Yep. It's by design. Inappropriate use of regulation (color of law) in such a broad context as to ensnare just about anything and everything. It's regulatory anarchy, no different than ObamaCare.

Boom Boom · Jul 21, 2015

protegeV said:
Think they would really go there??

Hell yes and then some, in vindictive overdrive. MD state govt has no shortage of childish ideologues who would sooner leave MD's economy in ruin than give up the dream of a lemming-style socialist utopia full of group hugs, rainbows, and mandatory facepalm (ahem, book).

chevellenut71 · Jul 21, 2015

clandestine said:
Not my fault. I only write love letters now.

Yes and the one you wrote me was very nice. Thank You! :lol2:

P.S. J/K :innocent0

I wish I did not loose mine C308 in that boating accident a few months back. :innocent0

Maverick0313 · Jul 21, 2015

protegeV said:
So MSP seems to have adopted the policy, "banned until someone goes to the trouble/expense to prove that it's not..."

pwoolford · Jul 21, 2015

-Z/28- said:
I have some concern that some of the letters are being written by the anti-gun crowd who monitor our board. They see us talking about a new legal rifle that looks scary and start writing to MSP about it.

In that case check out this super duper gun I just bought. It fires 3 million rounds per inch! The name is AR-Putkokinantimouth 100X!

Vile Shadow · Jul 21, 2015

-Z/28- said:
I have some concern that some of the letters are being written by the anti-gun crowd who monitor our board. They see us talking about a new legal rifle that looks scary and start writing to MSP about it.

If that's the case, then it does my heart good imagining their butthurt over the VZ's. :evilgrin3

Vile Shadow · Jul 21, 2015

pwoolford said:
In that case check out this super duper gun I just bought. It fires 3 million rounds per inch! The name is AR-Putkokinantimouth 100X!

Nah. It doesn't have a banana clip or a shoulder thing that goes up.

But it did appear in an Arnold Schwarzenegger movie or two. That's the worst "evil feature" of them all. :rolleyes:

aquaman · Jul 21, 2015

So much for Hogan's appointee.

Inigoes · Jul 21, 2015

aquaman said:
So much for Hogan's appointee.

Yep!

He's hostile to the 2A! :mad54:

BLS27 · Jul 21, 2015

pwoolford said:
In that case check out this super duper gun I just bought. It fires 3 million rounds per inch! The name is AR-Putkokinantimouth 100X!

Is that your concealed carry?

Billman · Jul 21, 2015

pwoolford said:
In that case check out this super duper gun I just bought. It fires 3 million rounds per inch! The name is AR-Putkokinantimouth 100X!

You have a career in marketing/branding... :lol:

OrbitalEllipses · Jul 21, 2015

Boom Boom said:
Yep. It's by design. Inappropriate use of regulation (color of law) in such a broad context as to ensnare just about anything and everything. It's regulatory anarchy, no different than ObamaCare.

Is there even a leg to stand on to ban guns by cosmetic appearance? That's ridiculous.

erwos · Jul 21, 2015

OrbitalEllipses said:
Is there even a leg to stand on to ban guns by cosmetic appearance? That's ridiculous.

That's the bizarre thing - there's not, and they state as much on the website. Even by their own stated rules, these rulings make no sense, and appear to be the result of someone eyeballing a gun rather than doing appropriate research.

Bolts Rock · Jul 21, 2015

After reading this latest BS and thinking it over, I smell a Frosh-hole. I let the dealer I bought mine from know that if MSP decides to mine 4473s with an eye seizing them that MSP is welcome to visit Free America and try.

Mike OTDP · Jul 21, 2015

protegeV said:
Think they would really go there??

To ask the question is to answer it.

lkenefic · Jul 21, 2015

Pardon my ignorance here, but since the "Century Arms " rifle (C308) has receiver parts that are more compatible with the Cetme design that the HK91 design, does this mean that original Spanish Cetme rifles are banned?

fred333 · Jul 21, 2015

Sling Blade said:
If that's the case, then it does my heart good imagining their butthurt over the VZ's.

Yup. And I'd reckon it's just a matter of time 'til they ban the VZ58/2008, which, from the mindset of the average gun-fearing lefty, is, considering the intent of the Oct '13 ban, for all intents and purposes effectively an AK.

On a more positive note, I was surprised to hear from an ex-google employee that google permits its people to utter the word "gun" in a non-critical manner not only within its confines but via its internal communication systems.
Most of this is redundant, but you'll get the idea within the first 10 minutes of so. There may be a glimmer of hope in the fruit-loop state after all:

Century Arms C308 BANNED in MD???

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Living in Free America!

"man gotta have a code."

Stop Negassing me!!!!!

Hold my beer. Watch this.

Hold my beer. Watch this.

Ultimate Member

Retired and loving it

AR15's make me :-)

Attachments

...

...

Ultimate Member

Head'n for the hills

Active Member

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

Ultimate Member

The Hebrew Hammer

Living in Free America!

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Banned

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics